The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:1379-1387, August 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.8.1379
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Araya, R.
* Articles by Simon, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Araya, R.
* Articles by Simon, G.
Related Collections
* Depression
* Other Patient Groups/Issues

Cost-Effectiveness of a Primary Care Treatment Program for Depression in Low-Income Women in Santiago, Chile

Ricardo Araya, Ph.D., M.D., Terry Flynn, Ph.D., Graciela Rojas, M.D., Rosemarie Fritsch, M.D., and Greg Simon, M.P.H., M.D.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care, multicomponent program with usual care for the treatment of depressed women in primary care in Santiago, Chile. METHOD: A cost-effectiveness study was conducted of a previous randomized controlled trial involving 240 eligible women with DSM-IV major depression who were selected from a consecutive sample of adult women attending primary care clinics. The patients were randomly allocated to usual care or a multicomponent stepped-care program led by a nonmedical health care worker. Depression-free days and health care costs derived from local sources were assessed after 3 and 6 months. A health service perspective was used in the economic analysis. RESULTS: Complete data were determined for 80% of the randomly assigned patients. After we adjusted for initial severity, women receiving the stepped-care program had a mean of 50 additional depression-free days over 6 months relative to patients allocated to usual care. The stepped-care program was marginally more expensive than usual care (an extra 216 Chilean pesos per depression-free day). There was a 90% probability that the incremental cost of obtaining an extra depression-free day with the intervention would not exceed 300 pesos ($1.04 U.S.). CONCLUSIONS: The stepped-care program was significantly more effective and marginally more expensive than usual care for the treatment of depressed women in primary care. Small investments to improve depression appear to yield larger gains in poorer environments. Simple and inexpensive treatment programs tested in developing countries might provide good study models for developed countries.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
P. Arean, M. Hegel, S. Vannoy, M.-Y. Fan, and J. Unuzter
Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Therapy for Older, Primary Care Patients With Depression: Results From the IMPACT Project
Gerontologist, June 1, 2008; 48(3): 311 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
V. Patel
Mental health in low- and middle-income countries
Br. Med. Bull., April 30, 2007; (2007) ldm010v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org