The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 106:116-121, August 1949
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.106.2.116
© 1949 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by FUNKENSTEIN, D.
* Articles by SOLOMON, H. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by FUNKENSTEIN, D.
* Articles by SOLOMON, H. C.

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF MENTALLY ILL PATIENTS

Part II—Changes in the Reactions to Epinephrine and Mecholyl After Electric Shock Treatment

DANIEL FUNKENSTEIN M. D.1, MILTON GREENBLATT M. D.2, STEVEN ROOT B. A.3, , and HARRY C. SOLOMON M. D.4

1 Senior Physician, Boston Psychopathic Hospital and Assistant in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
2 Chief of Laboratories and Research, Boston Psychopathic Hospital and Instructor in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
3 Assistant in Research at the Boston Psychopathic Hospital.
4 Director, Boston Psychopathic Hospital, and Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.

(1) The physiological and psychological response to intravenous epinephrine and intramuscular mecholyl of 24 neuropsychiatric patients was studied before and after a series of electric shock treatments. Special attention was given to the curves of systolic blood pressure following the injection of the drugs.

(2) Over-all effects of electric shock were:

(a) A lowering of the resting blood pressure level.

(b) An increase in the systolic blood pressure response after intravenous epinephrine.

(c) A lessened systolic blood pressure response after intramuscular mecholyl. These changes were usually accompanied by clinical improvement.

(3) Those patients who before shock treatment experienced an anxiety attack or a frank chill after injection of mecholyl showed a dramatic clinical response to electric shock treatment. Not only was their clinical condition greatly improved after a few electric shock treatments, but it was no longer possible to precipitate an anxiety attack or a chill by intramuscular mecholyl.

(4) Those patients with pretreatment high response to intravenous epinephrine (80 mm. Hg. or more) or with anxiety attacks precipitable by epinephrine showed no clinical improvement after electric shock. Anxiety was made worse.

(5) Several patients failed to show any change in pattern of response to autonomic drugs after electric shock treatment and these patients failed to show any sustained improvement in clinical condition.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1949 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org