The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.120.9.903

Evaluation of the scales on severity of convulsions revealed a significant difference between anectine-Na pentothal on the one hand and diazepam and placebo on the other hand. Even with the highest doses of diazepam, the convulsions were as severe as with placebo while they were significantly reduced on anectine-Na pentothal. This result is confirmed by the findings of fractures following diazepam and placebo, but not following anectine-Na pentothal. There were no side effects with anectine-Na pentothal treatment, but there was ataxia and drowsiness with high doses of diazepam.

It is concluded from this study that oral diazepam is not an adequate substitute for anectine-Na pentothal as pre-ECT medication for the prevention of fractures.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.