The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.71.4.773

I. In the cases diagnosed clinically as cerebrospinal syphilis the Wassermann reaction upon the spinal fluid was always positive and the colloidal gold test showed a reaction in the paretic zone.

II. In paresis the colloidal gold test was always found positive in cases where the spinal fluid showed a similar reaction to the Wassermann test, in addition to which there is one instance noted in which the fluid Wassermann was negative, but a reaction in the luetic zone obtained by the gold solution.

III. In dementia præcox, manic-depressive insanity, arteriosclerotic dementia and epilepsy there were no positive Wassermann reactions upon the fluid, and likewise no response to the gold solution in the typical "paretic zone". However, the latter reagent did furnish in eight cases of the 152 examined a reaction within the minor limits of the "luetic zone."

IV. In the unclassffied psychoses the calloidal gold and the Wassermann reactions upon the fluid ran a parallel course, except in one case, which showed a negative response to the Wassermann test upon the fluid, but gave a gold reaction in the "paretic zone." This instance is clinically a possible case of paresis.

V. From our work the opinion is drawn that the colloidal gold reaction forms a useful adjuvant to the Wassermann, is apparently as reliable and, in some instances, by reason of positive response in the absence of the Wassermann in clinically luetic cases, has seemed to point towards the possible appearance of a later positive Wassermann in the suspected individuals.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.