Measuring psychiatric utilization: the rubber yardstick
Abstract
The author suggests that measuring utilization of benefits for nervous and mental disorders by using the percent of total benefits paid is imprecise because even small changes in the much larger portion of benefit payments that are attributable to nonpsychiatric services can make it appear that the level of psychiatric utilization has changed. His preferred measure is a calculation of covered charges attributable to psychiatric care per each person covered under the plan. The author illustrates his points by showing that, when properly calculated, psychiatric utilization under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services is much lower than that under many other plans.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
