The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Duration of untreated psychosis is associated with time to treatment response among patients with schizophrenia. However, individual psychotic symptoms have not been investigated in this context. The authors examined the relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and time to response for hallucinations and delusions. METHOD: Data were available for 118 patients with first-episode schizophrenia in a longitudinal treatment study. Patients received open-label treatment with conventional antipsychotics and were followed for up to 5 years. Duration of untreated psychosis was correlated with time to response for delusions and hallucinations, and predictors of time to response were examined. RESULTS: Time to response for delusions was significantly longer than that for hallucinations. Duration of untreated psychosis was significantly correlated with time to response for delusions but not for hallucinations. In regression analyses, duration of untreated psychosis was the only predictor for time to response for delusions; it was not a predictor for hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that duration of untreated psychosis may be specifically associated with time to response for delusions. This association may have clinical implications.

Duration of untreated psychosis is generally long in schizophrenia (the mean is more than 1 year) (1, 2) and has been associated with variability in treatment response (3). Although several studies have examined the relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and general treatment response, individual symptoms have not been studied. Further, there is limited information regarding the time course of resolution of specific psychotic symptoms with antipsychotic treatment (4).

The first-episode schizophrenia studies conducted at Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N.Y., have provided us with a unique opportunity to follow patients for up to 5 years, starting from early stages of their illness, and make clinical observations that would have been impossible to do in short-term trials (5, 6). One of these observations is that patients with relatively long duration of untreated psychosis seem to take longer to give up their delusional beliefs than to recover from other symptoms such as hallucinations. It is widely accepted that delusions take longer to resolve than hallucinations. In the current study we also studied the response patterns of individual psychotic symptoms in relation to duration of untreated psychosis because such a differential association may be informative for clinical practice.

Our aim was to examine the relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and time to treatment response for delusions and hallucinations. We hypothesized that time to response for delusions would be longer than that for hallucinations. We also hypothesized that duration of untreated psychosis would be correlated with time to response for delusions but not for hallucinations. Additionally, we examined whether duration of untreated psychosis would predict time to response for both psychotic symptoms.

Method

The general methods of the study have been described in detail elsewhere (5, 6). Briefly, patients at Hillside Hospital who were experiencing their first episode of schizophrenia were recruited according to guidelines of the Long Island Jewish Hospital Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from patients and, if possible, from their families. Psychopathology was assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Change Version with psychosis and disorganization items (SADS-C) (7) and the Clinical Global Impression. Patients were treated according to a medication algorithm under open conditions for up to 5 years.

For this retrospective analysis, patients were included who had severity ratings for hallucinations or delusions of 2 (suspected or likely) or higher (definite) on the SADS-C at baseline. Treatment response was defined as a severity rating for hallucinations or delusions of 1 (absence) on the SADS-C for 6 weeks. Severity of hallucinations and severity of delusions were measured by the mean of the ratings for the severity of these symptoms.

Duration of untreated psychosis was assessed by interviews with patients and families. Duration of untreated psychosis was skewed and was dichotomized at 52 weeks. Highest level of functioning was measured by using the Premorbid Adjustment Scale (8). Parkinsonism was assessed by using the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (9).

The hypothesis that delusions would take longer to resolve was assessed with a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Correlations were carried out for duration of untreated psychosis and treatment response time for the target symptoms. Prediction of time to response was assessed with regression analyses. The significance level was p<0.05, two-tailed. Analyses were performed with SAS Version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.).

Results

Seventy-eight subjects had delusions at baseline and met response criteria for delusions. Eighty-eight subjects had hallucinations at baseline and met response criteria for hallucinations. Sixty-five subjects met criteria for both symptoms. The characteristics of the two groups are presented in Table 1.

The number of days to response for delusions (median=76; mean=150, SD=239) was significantly greater than that for hallucinations (median=27; mean=59, SD=104) (T=5308, p<0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). For delusions, the rank biserial correlation for duration of untreated psychosis and time to treatment response was r=0.39, N=78, p<0.02, while for hallucinations it was r=0.17, N=88, p=0.23.

The regression analyses were based on univariate correlational analyses (p<0.10) and previous publications on the same group of patients (6). Independent variables predicting time to response for delusions were duration of untreated psychosis, gender, parental social class, highest level of functioning, baseline parkinsonism, and baseline severity of delusions. Since time to response was skewed, a log transformation was used. Stepwise regression analyses indicated that duration of untreated psychosis was the only significant predictor for time to response for delusions (F=8.03, df=1, 69, p=0.006, R2=0.10). Parental social class (F=4.5, df=1, 76, p<0.04) and baseline severity of hallucinations (F=7.99, df=1, 76, p=0.006) were significant predictors for time to response for hallucinations (F=6.05, df=2, 76, p=0.004, R2=0.14). The results were unchanged when either forward or backward stepwise procedures were used.

We carried out the same analysis for a subset of patients who met entry criteria for both delusions and hallucinations at baseline (N=65). For time to response for delusions for these patients, duration of untreated psychosis was the only predictor (F=8.21, df=1, 56, p<0.006, R2=0.13). For time to response for hallucinations, baseline severity of hallucinations was the only predictor (F=4.83, df=1, 56, p<0.04, R2=0.08).

Discussion

These results confirm the clinical impression that time to response for delusions is longer than time to response for hallucinations. Duration of untreated psychosis may be specifically related to time to response for delusions but not for hallucinations. Delusions reflect thought patterns, whereas hallucinations are abnormal perceptual experiences. Roberts (10), by integrating previous theories, proposed that, like the formation of normal belief, delusional belief may also follow a temporal sequence. This sequence may progress through stages, including a prepsychotic stage that harbors predisposing and precipitating factors, an acute stage characterized by anomalous experiences and attribution of meaning to experience (formation of simple delusions), and a chronic stage, where a fixed delusional system is formed. It has been suggested that the environment contributes to persistence of simple delusional beliefs and emergence of fixed delusions “by suspicious withdrawal, fostering a process of progressive exclusion and depriving the patient of corrective experiences” (11). In contrast, theories of formation of hallucinations include biological phenomena such as cortical disinhibition and excitability (12). Therefore, delusions and hallucinations may have different vulnerabilities to the effects of time, i.e., untreated psychosis may reinforce abnormal thought patterns over time as opposed to perceptual abnormalities, which may be spared this temporal relationship.

Our finding may implicate different neural mechanisms underlying delusions and hallucinations even though both symptoms are frequently reported simultaneously when schizophrenia is first diagnosed. Several studies (1318) showed that smaller superior temporal gyrus volume is selectively correlated with severity of auditory hallucinations. Correlations between delusions and structural imaging data are more scarce; larger paleocortical relative to archicortical volumes have been associated with severity of delusions (19). Parahippocampal gyrus volumes were found to be negatively correlated with delusions, but not hallucinations (20), supporting findings of the former report (19). Symptom clusters have not been systematically investigated in functional and receptor imaging studies. Although the association of delusions and hallucinations with possible distinct neuroanatomic regions needs to be further explored in relation to duration of untreated psychosis, there is support for different neural substrates for the two symptoms.

An association between baseline severity of symptoms and global treatment outcome has been reported (21). The fact that severity of baseline hallucinations was a predictor for time to response for hallucinations but the severity of baseline delusions and time to response for delusions were not associated provides further support for presence of distinct correlates for the two symptoms. Parental social class was another predictor of time to response for hallucinations (standardized beta weight=–0.23); higher parental social class correlated with longer time to response for hallucinations.

Replication of the results of this investigation in independent samples may indicate a need to revisit the current clinical practice in the pharmacological treatment of first-episode schizophrenia. Specifically, for a patient with relatively long duration of untreated psychosis, response for delusions may be delayed despite successful treatment as reflected by attenuation of hallucinations. Patients with a short duration of untreated psychosis would be expected not to have this disadvantage. To further test this hypothesis, there is a need for controlled clinical trials in which the dose needed for subjects’ hallucinations to abate would be either maintained or titrated up in order to compare improvement in delusions in these two arms.

Important constraints in this retrospective analysis exist, such as lack of further characterization of duration of untreated psychosis. Duration of untreated psychosis itself may be dominated by delusions, hallucinations, or disorganization. This level of detail in the duration of untreated psychosis history was not available in our records. Future prospective studies are needed to clarify these matters.

TABLE 1

Presented as a poster at the 42nd Annual New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit Meeting, Boca Raton, Fla., June 10–13, 2002. Received June 28, 2004; revision received Nov. 2, 2004; accepted Nov. 8, 2004. From the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.; the Department of Psychiatry, VA Connecticut, West Haven; the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Maternal, Infant, and Reproductive Health, New York; the Department of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, N.Y.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gunduz-Bruce, VA Medical Center, Psychiatry Service 118A, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516; (e-mail). Supported by NIMH grants MH-41646, MH-00537, and MH-41960. The authors thank Sabina Meyer for her contribution to data collection.

References

1. Craig TJ, Bromet EJ, Fennig S, Tanenberg-Karant M, Lavelle J, Galambos N: Is there an association between duration of untreated psychosis and 24-month clinical outcome in a first-admission series? Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:60–66LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Larsen TK, McGlashan TH, Moe LC: First-episode schizophrenia, I: early course parameters. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22:241–256Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Norman RM, Malla AK: Duration of untreated psychosis: a critical examination of the concept and its importance. Psychol Med 2001; 31:381–400Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Breier A, Berg PH: The psychosis of schizophrenia: prevalence, response to atypical antipsychotics, and prediction of outcome. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:361–364Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, Woerner M, Degreef G, Bilder RM, Ashtari M, Bogerts B, Mayerhoff DI, Geisler SH, Loebel A, Levy DL, Hinrichsen G, Szymanski S, Chakos M, Koreen A, Borenstein M, Kane JM: Prospective study of psychobiology in first-episode schizophrenia at Hillside Hospital. Schizophr Bull 1992; 18:351–371Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6. Robinson DG, Woerner MG, Alvir JMJ, Geisler S, Koreen A, Sheitman B, Chakos M, Mayerhoff D, Bilder R, Goldman R, Lieberman JA: Predictors of treatment response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:544–549LinkGoogle Scholar

7. Spitzer RL, Endicott J: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia—Change Version, 3rd ed. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, 1978Google Scholar

8. Cannon-Spoor H, Potkin G, Wyatt J: Measurement of premorbid adjustment in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1982; 8:470–484Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9. Simpson GM, Angus JWS: A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1970; 212:11–19Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. Roberts G: The origins of delusion. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 161:298–308Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Berner P, Gabriel E, Kieffer W, Schanda H: “Paranoid psychoses”: new aspects of classification and prognosis coming from the Vienna Research Group. Psychopathology 1986; 19:16–29Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12. David AS: Auditory hallucinations: phenomenology, neuropsychology and neuroimaging update. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1999; 395:95–104Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13. Barta PE, Pearlson GD, Powers RE, Richards SS, Tune LE: Auditory hallucinations and smaller superior temporal gyral volume in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:1457–1462LinkGoogle Scholar

14. Flaum M, O’Leary DS, Swayze VW II, Miller DD, Arndt S, Andreasen NC: Symptom dimensions and brain morphology in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. J Psychiatr Res 1995; 29:261–276Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15. Levitan C, Ward PB, Catts SV: Superior temporal gyral volumes and laterality correlates of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:955–962Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16. Rajarethinam RP, DeQuardo JR, Nalepa R, Tandon R: Superior temporal gyrus in schizophrenia: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Schizophr Res 2000; 41:303–312Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17. Milev P, Ho BC, Arndt S, Nopoulos P, Andreasen NC: Initial magnetic resonance imaging volumetric brain measurements and outcome in schizophrenia: a prospective longitudinal study with 5-year follow-up. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:608–615Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18. Onitsuka T, Shenton ME, Salisbury DF, Dickey CC, Kasai K, Toner SK, Frumin M, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, McCarley RW: Middle and inferior temporal gyrus gray matter volume abnormalities in chronic schizophrenia: an MRI study. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:1603–1611LinkGoogle Scholar

19. Szeszko PR, Bilder RM, Lencz T, Pollack S, Alvir JM, Ashtari M, Wu H, Lieberman JA: Investigation of frontal lobe subregions in first-episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1999; 90:1–15Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20. Prasad KM, Rohm BR, Keshavan MS: Parahippocampal gyrus in first episode psychotic disorders: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2004; 28:651–658Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21. Breier A, Schreiber JL, Dyer J, Pickar D: National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal study of chronic schizophrenia: prognosis and predictors of outcome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48:239–246; correction, 48:642Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar