The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
CommentaryFull Access

The Value of an Integrated Psychiatrist on an Epilepsy Unit in the Management of Nonepileptic Seizures

Long-term EEG monitoring is a well-established procedure used in epilepsy monitoring units for the diagnosis of epilepsy. Well-developed epilepsy monitoring units utilize both scalp EEG recording and video monitoring to combine neurometric and clinical information. This allows neurologists to diagnose and define epilepsy syndromes. However, a significant proportion of patients on these units show no EEG findings, yet they exhibit clinical attacks that mimic seizures.

Clinical presentations of body convulsions that do not display any EEG findings have been termed "pseudo" or "psychogenic" seizures. This phenomenon as a symptom of conversion disorder is recognized in DSM-5, with it being a manifestation of an underlying psychological problem (1). It has been estimated that patients with such symptoms represent 10%–20% of cases referred to epilepsy centers (2). These patients demonstrate poor prognosis. In one study, 71% of patients continued to experience symptoms, and 56% were dependent on social security 11 years after onset (3). Challenges in the clinical setting include early recognition, management of comorbid psychiatric pathology, and appropriate treatment interventions.

Integrating a psychiatrist onto epilepsy monitoring units can bring value to managing patients' symptoms in three key ways: diagnosis, in-hospital care, and posthospital care. Firstly, having a psychiatrist to evaluate every patient admitted for monitoring allows for assessment of risk factors for conversion disorder and for other psychiatric comorbidity (4). Secondly, collaborating with neurologists during rounds will allow for a biopsychosocial formulation of these cases. If the diagnosis is deemed to be conversion disorder with attacks or seizures, the psychiatrist can assist the primary team in disclosing the diagnosis to the patient. This conversation may be very difficult for the patient, the patient's family, and his or her physicians (5). The psychiatrist can work alongside the neurologist, and when negative EEG findings are revealed, the patient can be informed about the symptom being an unconscious manifestation of stress, which is treatable without the need for anticonvulsant medications. Thirdly, the psychiatrist can assist with transition to outpatient treatment. On the basis of the psychiatric evaluation, psychotherapy can be tailored to the patient's symptoms, since many modalities exist for conversion disorders. The psychiatrist can also begin treatment and establish follow-up for any comorbid psychiatric illness. Thus, the challenges that give rise to poor prognosis in this patient population can be addressed, and patient outcomes can be improved.

The presence of psychiatry on epilepsy monitoring units addresses the gaps that exist in treating illnesses that belong to the realms of neurology and of psychiatry. This setting provides the ideal stage for both specialties to work collaboratively to treat syndromes that neither specialty is adequately managing on its own.

Dr. Chahal is a consultation-liaison psychiatry fellow in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.
References

1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2013 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2. Benbadis SR, Allen Hauser W: An estimate of the prevalence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Seizure 2000; 9:280–281 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3. Reuber M, Pukrop R, Bauer J, et al.: Outcome in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: 1 to 10-year follow-up in 164 patients. Ann Neurol 2003; 53:305–311 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4. Langfitt JT, Watson W: Evaluation and management of psychogenic, non-epileptic attacks, in Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Epilepsy . Edited by Barr W, Morrison C. New York, Springer Science+Business Media, 2015, pp 257–274 Google Scholar

5. Watson WH, Langfitt JT: Psychogenic non-epileptic attacks (PNEA). AAMFT Fam Ther 2010; 9:30–38 Google Scholar