The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Published Online:

To the Editor: We present a patient with high serum levels of aripiprazole caused by a common genetic modification in CYP2D6.

A 51-year-old female patient diagnosed with schizophrenia was admitted to our clinic. Little antipsychotic effect being observed, the dose of aripiprazole was increased from 15 mg to 30 mg per day. Within approximately 2 weeks, progressive symptoms of lethargy and memory loss were evident.

After testing blood samples, the serum level of aripiprazole in our patient turned out to be 2990 ng/ml, approximately seven times the expected plasma concentration at the maximum dose of 30 mg per day (1) .

Since aripiprazole is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 (2) , testing for a genetic polymorphism in these genes was initiated, showing a substitution of G1934→A on both alleles of the CYP2D6 gene (homozygote CYP2D6*4/*4), corresponding with the suspected slow metabolism. Pharmacokinetic interactions with CYP3A4 were excluded, since our patient did not use concomitant medication, herbals or grapefruit juice. When aripiprazole was substituted by quetiapine 400 mg daily, the adverse symptoms improved.

The high serum levels of aripiprazole, not the adverse events, are disconcerting. Poor metabolization is seen frequently, with prevalence rates in Caucasians of 7% and of 1%–4% in Asians and black Americans (3 , 4) . Additionally, although aripiprazole is relatively safe in cases of acute intoxication (5) , preclinical safety data revealed significant toxic effects in female rats, including 1) dose-dependent adrenocortical toxicity and 2) increased incidence of adrenocortical and combined carcinomas at three to 14 times, respectively, and 14 times the mean AUC at 30 mg a day (2) . Our patient showed serum levels in the range of the toxic effects in animal studies. The concordance rate of toxicity in humans with animal studies is 71% (6) . Assuming our patient to represent all poor metabolizers, many patients would potentially be at risk of long-term toxicity because of the good tolerability of aripiprazole (1) .

Since poor metabolizing occurs regularly, we recommend drug monitoring (expected plasmaconcentration at 15 mg and 30 mg daily: 206-278 ng/ml and 320–584 ng/ml, respectively [2] ) after 14 days of treatment, when a steady state is expected as well as further safety studies in poor metabolizers.

Leiden, the Netherlands

All authors report no competing interests.

References

1. Mallikaarjun S, Salazar DE, Bramer SL: Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of aripiprazole following multiple oral dosing in normal healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 44:179–187Google Scholar

2. Bristol-Myers Squibb BV: Aripiprazole Summary of Product Characteristics, 2004Google Scholar

3. Evans WE, Relling MV, Rahman A, McLeod HL, Scott EP, Lin JS: Genetic basis for a lower prevalence of deficient CYP2D6 oxidative drug metabolism phenotypes in black Americans. J Clin Invest 1993; 91:2150–2154Google Scholar

4. Mizutani T: PM frequencies of major CYPs in Asians and Caucasians. Drug Metab Rev 2003; 35:99–106Google Scholar

5. Carstairs SD, Williams SR: Overdose of aripiprazole, a new type of antipsychotic. J Emerg Med 2005; 28:311–313Google Scholar

6. Olson H, Betton G, Robinson D, Thomas K, Monro A, Kolaja G, Lilly P, Sanders J, Sipes G, Bracken W, Dorato M, Van Deun K, Smith P, Berger B, Heller A: Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2000; 32:56–67Google Scholar