The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Letters to the Editor

Published Online:

Pindolol-Paroxetine Combination

TO THE EDITOR: In an important contribution, Robert M. Berman, M.D., and colleagues (1) concluded that the combination of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine with pindolol, a serotonin (5-HT) blocker at 5-HT1A receptors, conveyed no advantage over treatment with fluoxetine alone in either response time or efficacy. The authors' experience differs from earlier open-label studies of the combination (2, 3), which were themselves based on promising studies in rats (4). We have recently completed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in which pindolol was combined with paroxetine in the treatment of major depression (5). The combination demonstrated both a reduction in latency of the antidepressant action and a possible superior efficacy that was sustained for up to 6 months after the trial's completion.

We were struck by some apparent differences between the two studies in the patient groups that were used. For example, we found that the pindolol-paroxetine combination worked less well for men over 35 years of age and for male and female subjects with a chronic history of dysthymia or depression or who were more severely depressed. We specifically excluded subjects who misused substances. It may be relevant that our patients were reviewed twice weekly during the first 2 weeks of the study and weekly thereafter to permit ascertainment of an early medication response.

These methodological issues apart, other possibilities may explain why Berman et al.'s patients did not show positive results. It is becoming clearer that the 5-HT1A receptor is subject to genetic polymorphism (6), and such differences may be highlighted by use of a 5-HT1A receptor blocker. Moreover, the isomer and the mixed enantiomer compositions of pindolol appear to act differently (in rats at any rate [7]) in their activity as partial agonists of 5-HT1A receptors. Thus, it could be that the isomeric composition differed between the two studies. Finally, although we agree with Berman et al. that there are no a priori reasons to suggest that the absence of an effect is due to the choice of fluoxetine, rather than paroxetine or citalopram, perhaps this requires more examination as well.

Drs. Berman and Charney Reply

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. Isaac M, Tomé M, Harte R: Serotonergic autoreceptor blockade in the reduction of antidepressant latency: a controlled trial, in New Research Program and Abstracts, 149th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC, APA, 1996, p 154 Google Scholar
  • 2. Artigas F, Romero L, de Montigny C, Blier P: Acceleration of the effect of selected antidepressant drugs in major depression by 5-HT1A antagonists. Trends Neurosci 1996; 19:378–383 Google Scholar
  • 3. Erdmann J, Shimron-Abarbanell D, Cichon S, Albus M, Maier W, Lichtermann D, Minges J, Reuner U, Franzek E, Ertl MA: Systematic screening for mutations in the promoter and the coding region of the 5-HT1A gene. Am J Med Genet 1995; 60:393–399 Google Scholar
  • 4. Xie DW, Deng ZL, Ishigaki T, Nakamura Y, Suzuki Y, Miyasato K, Ohara K, Ohara K: The gene encoding the 5-HT1A receptor is intact in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 1995; 12:263–268 Google Scholar
  • 5. Nakhai B, Nielsen DA, Linnoila M, Goldman D: Two naturally occurring amino acid substitutions in the human 5-HT1A receptor: glycine 22 to serine 22 and isoleucine 28 to valine 28. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995; 210:530–536 Google Scholar

Bulimia Outcome

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. Keel PK, Mitchell JE: Outcome in bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:313–321 Google Scholar
  • 2. Johnson-Sabine E, Reiss D, Dayson D: Bulimia nervosa: a 5-year follow-up study. Psychol Med 1992; 22:951–959 Google Scholar
  • 3. Reiss D, Johnson-Sabine E: Bulimia nervosa:5-year social outcome and relationship to eating pathology. Int J Eat Disord 1995; 18:127–133 Google Scholar
  • 4. Collings S, King M: Ten-year follow-up of 50 patients with bulimia nervosa. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 164:80–87 Google Scholar

REFERENCE

References

  • 1. Fairburn CG, Norman PA, Welch SL, O'Connor ME, Doll HA, Peveler RC: A prospective study of outcome in bulimia nervosa and the long-term effects of three psychological treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52:304–312 Google Scholar

Ms. Keel and Dr. Mitchell Reply

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. Fallon BA, Walsh T, Sadik C, Saoud JB, Lukasik V: Outcome and clinical course in inpatient bulimic women: a 2- to 9-year follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry 1991; 52:272–278 Google Scholar
  • 2. Patton GC: Mortality in eating disorders. Psychol Med 1988; 18:947–951 Google Scholar
  • 3. Olmsted MP, Kaplan AS, Rockert W: Rate and prediction of relapse in bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:738–743 Google Scholar

Schizophrenia Practice Guideline

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. American Psychiatric Association: Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154 (April suppl) Google Scholar
  • 2. Meltzer HJ, Goode DJ, Schyne PM, Young M, Fang VS: Effect of clozapine on human serum prolactin levels. Am J Psychiatry 1979; 136:550–555 Google Scholar
  • 3. Tollefson GD, Beasley CM Jr, Tran PV, Street JS, Krueger JA, Tamura RN, Graffeo KA, Thieme MA: Olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders: results of an international collaborative trial. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:457–465 Google Scholar
  • 4. Kaplan B, Modai I, Stoler M, Kitai E, Valevski A, Weizman A: Clozapine treatment and risk of unplanned pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Pract 1995; 8:239–241 Google Scholar

REFERENCES

References

  • 1. Glynn SM, Mueser KT: Social learning program, in Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Edited by Liberman RP. New York, Macmillan, 1992, pp 127–152 Google Scholar
  • 2. Kazdin AE: The token economy: a decade later. J Appl Behav Anal 1982; 15:431–445 Google Scholar
  • 3. Mueser KT, Liberman RP, Glynn S: Psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia, in Recent Advances in Schizophrenia. Edited by Kales A, Stefanis CN, Talbott JA. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 213–236 Google Scholar
  • 4. Menditto AA, Valdes L, Beck NC: Implementing a comprehensive social learning program within the forensic psychiatric services of Fulton State Hospital, in Behavior Therapy in Psychiatric Hospitals. Edited by Corrigan PW, Liberman RP. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp 61–78 Google Scholar
  • 5. Paul GL, Lentz R: Psychosocial Treatment of Chronic Mental Patients. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1977 Google Scholar
  • 6. Brenner HD, Dencker SJ, Goldstein MJ, Hubbard JW, Keegan DL, Kruger G, Kulhanek F, Liberman RP, Malm U, Midha KK: Defining treatment refractoriness in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1990; 16:551–561 Google Scholar
  • 7. Ayllon T, Azrin NH: The Token Economy: A Motivational System for Therapy and Rehabilitation. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968 Google Scholar
  • 8. Liberman RP, Van Putten T, Marshall BD Jr, Mintz J, Bowen L: Optimal drug and behavior therapy for treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:756–759 Google Scholar
  • 9. Austin NK, Liberman RP, King LW, DeRisi WJ: A comparative evaluation of two day hospitals: goal attainment scaling of behavior therapy vs milieu therapy. J Nerv Ment Dis 1976; 163:253–261 Google Scholar
  • 10. Menditto AA, Beck NC, Stuve P, Fisher JA, Stacy M, Logue MB, Baldwin LJ: Effectiveness of clozapine and a social learning program for severely disabled psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Services 1996; 47:46–51 Google Scholar
  • 11. Bellack AS, Mueser KT: Psychosocial treatment for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993; 19:317–336 Google Scholar
  • 12. Penn DL, Mueser KT: Research update on the psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:607–617 Google Scholar
  • 13. Smith TE, Bellack AS, Liberman RP: Social skills training for schizophrenia: review and future directions. Clin Psychol Rev 1996; 16:599–617 Google Scholar

Dr. Herz and Colleagues Reply

Studies have suggested that patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who require long-term hospitalization profit most from treatment programs that emphasize highly structured behavioral techniques, including a token economy, point systems, and skills training that can improve patients' functioningParadoxically, despite its demonstrated efficacy, the token economy is not often used in clinical settings..Obstacles to its implementation include resistance by staff who hold tightly to traditional custodial methods, increased costs (for the reinforcers backing up the tokens), lack of support from administrators, and inadequate training of clinical staff.”

References

1. Berman RM, Darnell AM, Miller HL, Anand A, Charney DS: Effect of pindolol in hastening response to fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:37–43LinkGoogle Scholar

2. Artigas F, Perez V, Alvarez E: Pindolol induces a rapid improvement of depressed patients treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (letter). Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:248–251Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Blier P, Bergeron R: Effectiveness of pindolol with selected antidepressant drugs in the treatment of major depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1995; 15:217–222Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Hjorth S, Auerbach SB: Further evidence for the importance of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the action of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol 1994; 260:251–255Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Tomé MB, Isaac MT, Harte R, Holland C: Paroxetine and pindolol: a randomised trial of serotonergic autoreceptor blockade in the reduction of antidepressant latency. Int J Clin Psychopharmacol (in press)Google Scholar

6. Bergen A, Wang CY, Nakhai B, Goldman D: Mass allele detection (MAD) of rare 5-HT1A structural variants with allele-specific amplification and electrochemiluminescent detection. Hum Mutat 1996; 7:135–143Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Hjorth S, Carlsson A: Is pindolol a mixed agonist-antagonist at central serotonin (5-HT) receptors? Eur J Pharmacol 1986; 129:131–138Google Scholar