The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

To the Editor: Personality disorders are highly prevalent, disabling, and costly. Decades of research suggest that they commonly emerge in childhood and adolescence, demonstrate early stability, and, critically, respond well to early treatment and prevention efforts (1). It is vital that early-onset personality disorders are properly identified, as accurate diagnosis is essential for implementation of effective interventions.

Despite consistent empirical support for the validity of pediatric personality disorders, there are indications that practitioners resist personality disorder assessment in young people. Yet aside from several practitioner surveys (e.g., reference 2), large-scale data are lacking on the extent of this underdiagnosis. We therefore analyzed responses from a large national survey of university students who reported whether they had been diagnosed previously with a mental illness by a health professional. We compared those reports with the prevalence of personality disorder diagnoses ascertained with structured interviews in a university student subsample of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) (3).

The Healthy Minds Study (4) included 113,515 students from 105 U.S. universities who provided complete histories of psychiatric diagnoses. As shown in Table 1, about one in 200 Healthy Minds Study students was diagnosed with any personality disorder, and rates of individual personality disorders were as low as one in 10,000. By comparison, more than five in 100 respondents had been diagnosed with major depressive disorder. The discrepancy in prevalence between personality disorder and depression was even more pronounced in the Healthy Minds Study treatment-seeking subsample.

TABLE 1. University Student Histories of Personality Disorder Diagnosisa

All Healthy Minds Study Participants (N=113,515)Healthy Minds Study Treatment-Seeking Participants (N=29,974)bNESARC Subsample (N=2,188)c
Psychiatric DisorderN%N%N%
Major depression6,1085.384,97416.591547.04
Paranoid personality disorder530.05400.131064.86
Schizoid personality disorder350.03280.09723.31
Schizotypal personality disorder190.02150.05d
Antisocial personality disorder1260.11950.321034.70
Borderline personality disorder2890.252400.80d
Histrionic personality disorder150.01110.04763.47
Narcissistic personality disorder360.03290.10d
Avoidant personality disorder670.06470.17502.31
Dependent personality disorder410.04280.09110.51
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder820.07690.231808.24
Any personality disorder5290.474091.3638717.68

aRespondents were, on average, 22.91 years old (SD=5.49); 64% were female; and 73% identified as white.

bHealthy Minds Study participants who sought mental health treatment in the past 12 months.

cUniversity student subsample of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

dSchizotypal, borderline, and narcissistic personality disorders were not assessed in this NESARC study sample.

TABLE 1. University Student Histories of Personality Disorder Diagnosisa

Enlarge table

The comparison of the “true” disorder rates from the NESARC with the “diagnosed” rates from the Healthy Minds Study illustrates that the vast majority of young people who have a personality disorder are undiagnosed. The true versus diagnosed prevalence rates differ by a factor of approximately 40 for personality disorders, compared with a factor of 1.3 for major depression.

We caution that our contrasts rely on patients’ reports of diagnoses, which may be imperfect proxies of true assessment results. Also, the lion’s share of research on pediatric personality disorders has targeted borderline personality disorder, but we could not evaluate the underdiagnosis of borderline personality disorder because it was not surveyed in the NESARC university subsample. With those caveats in mind, we conclude that practitioners are not assessing or treating personality disorders prior to adulthood, despite a clear need for early intervention. Given the data supporting the concurrent and prognostic importance of personality disorder diagnoses in youths, clinicians arguably should assess them.

From the Department of Psychology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Va.; the Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Address correspondence to Dr. Conway ().

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

References

1 Bernstein DP, Cohen P, Velez CN, et al.: Prevalence and stability of the DSM-III-R personality disorders in a community-based survey of adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150:1237–1243LinkGoogle Scholar

2 Laurenssen EMP, Hutsebaut J, Feenstra DJ, et al.: Diagnosis of personality disorders in adolescents: a study among psychologists. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2013; 7:3Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, et al.: Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:1429–1437Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Eisenberg D, Hunt J, Speer N: Mental health in American colleges and universities: variation across student subgroups and across campuses. J Nerv Ment Dis 2013; 201:60–67Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar