The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

Objective:

Significant immunological alterations have been observed in women with first-onset affective psychosis during the postpartum period. Recent studies have highlighted the possibility that a subset of patients with first-onset severe psychiatric episodes might suffer from undiagnosed autoimmune encephalitis. Therefore, the authors performed a three-step immunohistochemistry-based screening for CNS autoantibodies in a large cohort of patients with postpartum psychosis and matched postpartum comparison subjects.

Method:

Ninety-six consecutive patients with postpartum psychosis and 64 healthy postpartum women were included. Screening for antibodies in patient serum was performed using immunohistochemistry. Samples showing any staining were further examined by immunocytochemistry using live hippocampal neurons and cell-based assays to test for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibodies. Cell-based assays for all other known CNS antigens were performed in those samples with immunocytochemistry labeling but negative for NMDA receptor antibodies.

Results:

Four patients (4%) with neuropil labeling suggestive for extracellular antigen reactivity were identified. Serum samples from all four patients showed clear extracellular labeling of live hippocampal neurons. Two women had the specific staining pattern characteristic for anti-NMDA receptor antibody positivity, which was confirmed by cell-based assays. Neither patient with anti-NMDA receptor antibody positivity had evidence of an ovarian teratoma. The other two patients tested negative by cell-based assays for all known CNS antigens. None of the matched postpartum comparison subjects had confirmed neuronal surface antibodies. The two patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibodies both showed extrapyramidal symptoms following initiation of treatment with low-dose haloperidol.

Conclusions:

In patients with acute psychosis during the postpartum period, systematic screening for anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies should be considered. The acute onset of severe atypical psychiatric symptoms in young female patients should raise the index of suspicion for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, particularly in the setting of neurological symptoms, including extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic treatment.

Postpartum psychosis is the most severe form of pregnancy-related psychiatric illness, with a prevalence in the general population of 0.1% (1, 2). Given that postpartum psychosis is a severe, potentially life-threatening disorder during the acute phase, the prognosis is remarkably optimistic: nearly all women have a complete remission of symptoms within 6 months postpartum. However, women with a prior episode of postpartum psychosis are at a significantly elevated risk of relapse after a subsequent pregnancy, estimated to be approximately 30% and therefore approximately 300-fold higher than the general population risk. In addition, women with a previous postpartum psychosis also have an increased risk for severe affective episodes outside the postpartum period.

Postpartum psychosis occurs most frequently in primiparous women without a psychiatric history and generally manifests acutely within 4 weeks after delivery. The cardinal symptomatology is affective and severe, including acute mania, depression, or a mixed state. Psychotic symptoms almost exclusively occur within the setting of affective instability. Consequently, postpartum psychosis is generally considered a bipolar-spectrum mood disorder and not a primary psychotic disorder (3). However, unlike a classical bipolar-spectrum illness, postpartum psychosis is also notable for its delirium-like appearance. Women with postpartum psychosis frequently exhibit atypical cognitive symptoms such as disorientation, misrecognition of people, derealization, and depersonalization (4, 5).

During the acute phase, all patients require thorough physical and neurological examinations and comprehensive laboratory analyses to exclude known organic causes for acute psychosis and mania. In the vast majority of patients, the underlying pathophysiology remains unknown. For a subgroup of patients, postpartum activation of the immune system might be central to the pathogenesis of postpartum psychosis (68). Patients with postpartum psychosis have significantly elevated rates of autoimmune thyroiditis and pre-eclampsia, both of which have established autoimmune etiologies (9). Furthermore, abnormalities in monocyte activation and T-cell function have been observed in patients with postpartum psychosis during the acute phase (6).

Over the last several years, multiple neuronal autoantibodies have been identified, leading to an emerging definition of “cell surface antibody-associated CNS disorders” in patients who might otherwise have been diagnosed as having a classical psychiatric illness (10). For example, anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis, an autoimmune disorder in which IgG antibodies are directed against the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor, has been identified in young patients with first-onset psychiatric symptoms (11, 12). Against this background, we hypothesized that postpartum autoimmune encephalitis might be the primary pathophysiological mechanism for a subgroup of patients with postpartum psychosis. Accordingly, we performed an immunohistochemistry-based screening for CNS autoantibodies in a large cohort of patients with postpartum psychosis and matched postpartum comparison subjects.

Method

Patients

Ninety-six (N=96) consecutive patients with postpartum psychosis were recruited from the Mother-Baby Inpatient Unit of the Department of Psychiatry of the Erasmus University Medical Center between August 2005 and May 2012. All patients were diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders Patient Edition. We have included patients with any of the following diagnoses, including the specifier “onset postpartum”: depressive disorder with psychotic features, mania with psychotic features, mixed episode with psychotic features, or brief psychotic disorder. Importantly, the specifier “onset postpartum” requires that the onset of symptoms must occur within 4 weeks postpartum. Physical examination and routine laboratory screening were performed at the time of study enrollment (median: 4 weeks postpartum). All patients were in an acute disease state at the moment of blood withdrawal.

Of 96 women, 21 had a diagnosis of mania and/or psychosis outside the perinatal period (bipolar disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified). Accordingly, 75 patients had mania and/or psychosis limited to the postpartum period, of which 62 patients were experiencing their first psychotic episode while 13 had at least one previous episode of postpartum psychosis.

The postpartum comparison cohort consisted of 64 healthy postpartum women recruited between 2008 and 2012 through the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam). These women had no clinically significant psychiatric history and an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score <10 at the time of the 4-week postpartum blood sampling.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. After receiving a complete description of the study, all patients and their authorized legal representatives provided written informed consent.

Antibody Testing

Screening for antibodies in patients’ serum was performed in all cases using immunohistochemistry with rat brain optimized for membrane-bound antibodies. To confirm the presence of neuronal surface antibodies, all samples showing any staining were tested by immunocytochemistry using live hippocampal neurons (13) and HEK cells recombinantly expressing GluN1/N2B to test for NMDA receptor antibodies (cell-based assay) (14). Serum samples with immunocytochemistry labeling but negative for NMDA receptor antibodies were screened with cell-based assays for all other known CNS antigens, including AMPA receptor (15), GABAA receptor (16), GABAB receptor (10), LGI1 (15), Caspr2 (10), DPPX (17), mGluR5 (10), D2 receptor (18), and glycine receptor (19).

Immunohistochemistry.

This methodology has been described previously (14). In brief, adult Wistar rats were sacrificed without perfusion, and brains were removed, mid-sagittally sectioned, fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at 4 C°, cryopreserved in 40% sucrose for 48 hours at 4°C, embedded in freezing compound media, and snap frozen in isopentane chilled with liquid nitrogen. Seven micron-thick sections were then incubated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 minutes, with 10% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour, and then labeled with patient or comparison sample (dilution 1:200) at 4°C overnight. The next day, sections were washed and then incubated with a secondary biotinylated goat antihuman IgG (dilution 1:2,000, Vector BA-3000 [Burlingame, Calif., Vector Laboratories]) for 1 hour at room temperature, and the reactivity was developed with the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method (Burlingame, Calif., Vector Laboratories).

Immunocytochemistry on neuronal cultures.

Primary rat hippocampal neuronal cultures were prepared as previously reported (20). Live neurons grown on coverslips were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with patient or comparison serum (dilution 1:200). After removing the media and extensive washing with cold phosphate-buffered saline, neurons were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100, and immunolabeled with Alexa Fluor 488 goat antihuman IgG (diluted 1:1,000, Invitrogen A11013 [Waltham, Mass., Invitrogen]). Immunocytochemistry labeling was imaged using an epifluorescence microscope with Zeiss Axiovision software (Thornwood, N.Y., Zeiss).

Cell-based assay.

The cell-based assay consisted of HEK293 cells transfected with plasmids expressing GluN1/N2B in equimolar ratios as described previously (14). Cells were grown for 24 hours after transfection and in the presence of ketamine (500 μM) to prevent cell death after transfection. Transfected cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (5 minutes at room temperature), permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (5 minutes at room temperature), incubated with serum diluted 1:40 (2 hours at room temperature), then washed with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody against a noncompeting GluN1 epitope located in the extracellular loop at amino acid 660–811 (dilution 1:20,000; MAB363, Billerica, Mass., Millipore) for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by the corresponding fluorescent secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 goat antihuman IgG, Invitrogen A11013, diluted 1:1,000; Alexa Fluor 594 goat antimouse IgG, Invitrogen A11032, diluted 1:1,000) for 1 hour at room temperature. Cell-based assays for AMPA receptor, GABAA receptor, GABAB receptor, mGluR5, LGI1, Caspr2, DPPX, D2 receptor, and glycine receptor were performed as previously described.

Results

The demographic and overall clinical characteristics of the study cohort are shown in Table 1. Using the combination of immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry with live hippocampal neurons, and cell-based assay, we identified four patients with neuropil labeling suggestive of extracellular antigen reactivity (N=4/96, 4%; Figure 1A, Figure 1C). Of these four patients, two (N=2/96, 2%) had the specific staining pattern characteristic for anti-NMDA receptor antibody positivity, which was confirmed with cell-based assay. The other two patients showed clear extracellular labeling of live hippocampal neurons (Figure 1A, Figure 1C) but tested negative for all known CNS antigens. The target antigen for the two non-NMDA receptor patients could not be identified. None of the other postpartum psychosis patients, nor any of the postpartum comparison subjects, had neuropil labeling suggestive of extracellular antigen reactivity.

TABLE 1. Patient Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

CharacteristicPostpartum Psychosis Group (N=96)Healthy Postpartum Comparison Group (N=64)
MeanSDMeanSD
Age (years)31.25.632.84.2
Days postpartum blood was drawn32.328.529.517.2
N%N%
Caucasian79824875
Primiparity75784164
Primigravidity59613859
Caesarean section15161625
Psychiatric history
 Bipolar disorder161700
 Psychosis5500
 Previous postpartum episodes131400
Phenomenology
 Manic features5557NA
 Depressed features1112NA
 Mixed features2223NA
 Psychosis with no affective features88NA

TABLE 1. Patient Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Enlarge table
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1. Demonstration of Uncharacterized Cell-Surface Antigens in a Cohort of Postpartum Psychosis Patientsa

a The reactivity of a postpartum psychosis patient’s serum antibodies is shown using immunohistochemistry of rat brain (brown staining in panel A) and cultured dissociated hippocampal neurons (green cell-surface neuronal labeling in panel C). The identity of the antigen is unknown. Panels B and D show the lack of reactivity of serum from a matched postpartum healthy comparison subject. In panels C and D, the nuclei of the neurons are shown with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. In panels A–B, original magnification×2 is shown, counterstained with hematoxylin. In panels C–D, a 100X oil lens was used for immunofluorescence imaging.

The clinical details of the four patients with cell surface antibody-associated CNS disorder are presented in Table 2 and described below. Importantly, no distinguishing clinical characteristics were identifiable that segregated the four antibody-positive patients from the remaining 92 patients within the postpartum psychosis cohort. From the overall postpartum psychosis cohort, 66 women were treated with haloperidol, of which 17 were switched to atypical antipsychotics because of clinically significant extrapyramidal side effects. Notably, however, both patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibodies showed extrapyramidal side effects with low doses of haloperidol (Table 2).

TABLE 2. Characteristics of Four Patients With CNS Disorders Associated With Antibodies Against Neuronal Cell Surface Antigens

Patient Parity/Gravidity, Pregnancy Outcome (Sex), and AgeCNS AntibodyPredominant Psychiatric Symptoms PostpartumTreatmentEpisode (Days)Neurological SymptomsComorbidityTumorRemissionFollow-Up Antibody ScreeningPsychiatric HistoryFamily History
P1G1, healthy daughter, 31 years oldAnti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptorMania; delusions of grandeur; bizarre behaviorAntipsychotic, lithium34Extrapyramidal symptoms (after use of haloperidol)Autoimmune thyroid diseaseNoneFull (84 months)NegativeNoneNone
P3G3, healthy daughter, 25 years oldAnti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptorAuditory hallucinations; paranoid delusionsAntipsychotic, lithium30Extrapyramidal symptoms (after use of haloperidol)NoneNoneFull (60 months)NegativePostpartum psychosisPostpartum depression
P1G1, healthy son, 30 years oldUnknown neuronal surface antibodyDepression; delusions; visual hallucinations; suicidal ideationAntipsychotic, lithium65NoneNoneNoneFull (72 months)NegativeNoneBipolar disorder
P1G1, healthy son, 21 years oldUnknown neuronal surface antibodyDepression; auditory hallucinations; paranoidAntipsychotic25NoneNoneNoneFull (12 months)PositiveNoneAutism

TABLE 2. Characteristics of Four Patients With CNS Disorders Associated With Antibodies Against Neuronal Cell Surface Antigens

Enlarge table

Case Vignettes of Patients With Anti-NMDA Antibody Positivity

Patient 1.

“Mrs. H” is a 31-year-old primiparous primigravid woman with no prior psychiatric history, who delivered a healthy daughter at home following an unremarkable pregnancy. After 1 week, she confessed to her husband a belief that she had special gifts. She developed increasingly progressive confusion, leading to psychiatric admission at day 12 postpartum. On admission, she wrapped a blanket and a towel around her head and right arm, explaining to the psychiatrist, “This has everything to do with my special daughter and the beautiful, colorful world and prime numbers.” She was diagnosed with manic and psychotic features. Physical examination and routine laboratory investigations, including thyroid screening, were normal. On admission, Mrs. H was treated with lorazepam and haloperidol. However, because of extrapyramidal side effects, haloperidol was switched to olanzapine. After 2 weeks, she required addition of lithium according to our structured treatment protocol (21). Over the next month, she developed a subclinical hypothyroiditis, which was diagnosed as thyroid peroxidase antibody-positive autoimmune thyroiditis. On a combination of lithium, olanzapine, and lorazepam, her psychiatric symptoms fully remitted, with the total duration of her episode being 34 days. Olanzapine and lorazepam were slowly titrated to discontinuation, after which she was discharged home from the hospital on lithium monotherapy, 2 months after delivery. Lithium was discontinued at 9 months postpartum, with no recurrence of symptoms following inpatient discharge.

Two years after her first delivery, Mrs. H gave birth to a second healthy daughter. Immediate postpartum prophylactic treatment with olanzapine was initiated to reduce the 30% relapse risk postpartum without medication (22). Olanzapine was recommended for mood stabilization instead of lithium, given the relative contraindication regarding the risk for thyrotoxicity in patients with thyroid peroxidase antibody positivity (9). Mrs. H remained psychiatrically stable throughout the postpartum period. During the past 7 years of outpatient follow-up since discharge, she has remained in full remission and maintained successful full-time work.

Patient 2.

“Mrs. A” is a 25-year-old multiparous woman who gave birth to her third child, a healthy daughter. She had experienced postpartum psychosis at the age of 16 in Middle East Asia. Because of traumatic events, she fled her home country and immigrated to the Netherlands with her husband and child. During her second pregnancy, she was referred to our hospital and agreed to use lithium for postpartum prophylaxis. She remained clinically stable throughout the entire postpartum period. Two years later, her third pregnancy was uneventful. After delivery, she declined lithium prophylaxis and relapsed. On admission, 3 weeks after her singleton delivery, she told the psychiatrist, “I gave birth to a twin, but someone has taken my other baby away.” She had auditory hallucinations, and she was diagnosed with a psychotic episode, without manic features. She was treated with the sequential addition of lorazepam, haloperidol, and lithium, but haloperidol was tapered off because of extrapyramidal side effects. Her symptoms were in remission within 3 months. Over the past 5 years of outpatient follow-up since discharge, Mrs. A has been free of manic or clear psychotic symptoms, but she had minor mood instabilities and transient paranoid ideas. According to her husband, she has had these symptoms since her flight from her home country but has been able to take care of their three children.

Both patient 1 and patient 2 were identified retrospectively as anti-NMDA receptor antibody positive through this research study. We informed both women of this result and performed evaluations for ovarian teratoma by transvaginal ultrasound, which was negative. CSF analysis was not performed, given the remission of psychiatric symptoms without requiring maintenance pharmacotherapy and the absence of any known neurological or somatic symptoms.

Case Vignettes of Patients With Antibodies Against Unknown Cell Surface

Patient 3.

“Mrs. V” is a 30-year-old primiparous primigravid woman with no prior psychiatric history, who delivered a healthy son after a 32-hour labor and delivery. Within 3 weeks postpartum, she developed increasingly severe depression and anxiety. Her family developed particular concern for her well-being because her mother had committed suicide within a few weeks after her birth.

Six weeks after delivery, Mrs. V experienced delusions of guilt and visual hallucinations and soon thereafter stopped eating. On admission she reported, “I am bankrupt, and my son is ill,” the reality of which was refuted by parallel history from the family. She was treated with lorazepam and quetiapine, without therapeutic benefit. Two weeks after admission, Mrs. V attempted suicide by hanging. Lithium was added to her medication regimen. On the combination of lorazepam, quetiapine, and lithium, she achieved full remission of her symptoms after 65 days. She was discharged home at 4 months postpartum. Lithium was discontinued at 9 months postpartum according to our structured treatment protocol, given the absence of any relapse episodes following discharge (21). Four years after discharge, Mrs. V became pregnant again and delivered a healthy daughter. She was given prophylactic lithium immediately following the delivery of her daughter and remained stable throughout the postpartum period. Over the past 6 years of outpatient follow-up since discharge, Mrs. V has remained in full remission.

Patient 4.

“Mrs. M” is a 21-year-old primiparous primigravid woman with no prior psychiatric history, who delivered a healthy son after an unremarkable pregnancy. One week after delivery, her husband noticed that she was getting more and more depressed and anxious. At 2 weeks postpartum, she was involuntarily admitted to the Erasmus Medical Center. She was crying and screaming that people were following her, and she had auditory hallucinations. She was diagnosed with postpartum psychosis with depressive features and treated with benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. Because of anemia, ferrous fumarate was started. Within 2 weeks, her psychotic and depressive symptoms were in remission, but she was still highly irritable. Upon her request, she was transferred to a mother-baby unit in her own geographic region. Over the past 12 months of outpatient follow-up since discharge, Mrs. M has remained in full remission.

Patients 3 and 4 were diagnosed with “CNS disorders associated with antibodies against unknown neuronal cell surface antigens” through this research study. The target antigen remains unknown. Monocyte gene expression and T-cell data previously collected from these two patients were retrospectively analyzed (6). No difference in inflammatory gene expression was observed in comparison with the other first-onset postpartum psychosis patients examined in parallel. In contrast, patients 3 and 4 showed notable differences in their lymphocyte counts. Natural killer cells were moderately elevated in patients 3 and 4 (20.3% and 13.8%, respectively) compared with the overall group with first-onset postpartum psychosis (10.9% [SD=4.7%]) and postpartum comparison subjects (8.8% [SD=3.4%]). Furthermore, we previously showed that these patients exhibit a blunted postpartum elevation of T-cells (74.4% [SD=8.4%]) compared with healthy postpartum comparison subjects (81.1% [SD=6.0%]) (6). Patients 3 and 4 had particularly low T-cell counts (57.4% and 66.8%, respectively). In addition, percentages of CD4+CD25highFoxP3+ natural T-regulatory cells were lower in patients 3 and 4 (1.5% and 1.6%, respectively) compared with postpartum psychosis patients and postpartum comparison subjects (2.1% [SD=0.61%] and 2.2% [SD=0.76%]). Regulatory T-cells have a primary role in maintaining tolerance to self-antigens, for which T-regulatory cell deficiencies have been increasingly associated with autoimmune disorders (23).

Discussion

Out of 96 consecutive patients with postpartum psychosis screened for CNS surface antibodies, four patients showed neuronal cell surface antibodies suggestive for encephalitis (4%). Two of these patients were identified as having anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, while for the other two patients the antigen remains unknown. Notably, none of the 64 healthy postpartum comparison subjects had confirmed neuronal surface antibodies.

Two patients (2%) out of the total cohort of 96 were identified as anti-NMDA receptor antibody positive. Notably, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis was not initially considered during the acute clinical presentation because of the absence of classical features of autoimmune encephalitis, including seizures, decreased consciousness, dyskinesia, and autonomic instability. Importantly, however, and only in retrospect, it is notable that both of the patients with anti-NMDA receptor antibody positivity had extrapyramidal symptoms with only a low dose of haloperidol, a clinical sign frequently seen among patients with autoimmune encephalitis (personal observations by M.J.T. and J.D.).

Both patients recovered after treatment with lithium, and remission was sustained, despite the absence of any steroid or immunosuppressive treatment. In general, immunotherapy and removal of an identified ovarian teratoma are the definitive treatments for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, both during the acute phase and for relapse prevention (24). The effectiveness of this treatment strategy has been described in the postpartum period (2527). In contrast to previous case reports of postpartum anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, our patients displayed only a few of the classical neurological symptoms. A partial, or attenuated, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis syndrome with predominantly psychiatric symptoms and few, if any, classical neurological features of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis has been described in approximately 4% of all patients with NMDA encephalitis (28, 29). Moreover, some of these patients might have antibodies with a distinct affinity and/or antigen location within the NMDA receptor complex (13, 30). Lastly, the dynamic immunological changes of the postpartum period could also provide an explanation for the full recovery of both patients without immunotherapy in the present study.

Two patients (N=2/96, 2%) showed neuronal cell surface antibodies suggestive for encephalitis, but the corresponding antigen has remained unknown after comprehensive screening with cell-based assays. Levels of antibodies were insufficient to identify the antigen. Our hope is that with ongoing screening of additional cases, we might find additional patients with similar staining patterns and provide an opportunity for more sophisticated antigen identification approaches. In contrast to patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis for whom the estimated relapse risk is 15%, the relapse risks for these two patients with unknown antigens remains unknown. We intend to closely monitor all four patients identified with cell surface antibody-associated CNS disorder and have advised them to contact us immediately if they experience any remarkable neurological or psychiatric symptoms.

A major caveat in CNS autoantibody testing has been false positivity, as previously shown in patients with a presumed diagnosis of schizophrenia who tested positive for NMDA receptor antibodies using only cell-based assay screening (31). Among healthy cohorts, anti-NMDA receptor antibodies can often be detected in serum using cell-based assays, although IgG antibodies are rarely present (0.4%) (32). Therefore, we previously recommended that detection of serum antibodies to neuronal cell surface antigens, including anti-NMDA receptor, should involve at least two of three antigen-binding assays: 1) immunohistochemistry with rat brain sections optimized for antigen presentation, 2) live dissociated primary neuronal cultures, or 3) a recombinant cell-based assay using transfected cells expressing the antigen of interest or confirmation by CSF testing (10, 13, 14). Accordingly, if a patient’s serum demonstrates autoantibody positivity by cell-based assay, then at least one additional assay should be performed to verify the result. Using this confirmatory method, no false positives have yet been identified by our group, together including over 10,000 samples (unpublished observations). In addition, this method of confirmatory screening has also been shown to provide significantly higher sensitivity for detecting CNS cell surface antibodies (10, 33).

In the present study, CSF was not sampled at the time of acute symptom onset, given the lack of any overt neurological symptoms suggestive of classical anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. CSF has been previously shown to provide a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting CNS autoantibodies, and therefore our analysis using serum may underestimate the frequency of autoimmune encephalitis in postpartum psychosis (14). Importantly, however, all four patients with positive immunohistochemistry labeling were confirmed using live neuron immunocytochemistry, thereby proving the presence of an antibody binding to an extracellular antigen.

To date, systematic screening for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in psychiatric case/control cohorts has been reported in five studies. Zandi et al. (28) exclusively used cell-based assay and concluded that three out of 46 schizophrenia patients had GluN1 and/or GluN2 serum antibodies. Of these patients, two had decreased verbal fluency, and the remaining third had antibody titers that would fall below the currently accepted threshold for positivity (34). Three follow-up studies did not confirm these findings using cell-based assay, among a total of 206 schizophrenia patients and 70 affective disorder patients, for which a subset of 80 subjects also tested negative by immunohistochemistry (32, 35, 36). In the most recent study, IgG anti-GluN1 serum cell-based assay positivity was reported in eight of 1,378 schizophrenia patients (0.6%) and six of 310 affective disorder patients (1.9%); however, no additional confirmatory antibody testing or clinical follow-up was performed (36). Taken together, the current best evidence suggests that most patients with well-established chronic psychiatric disorders are unlikely to have anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (24, 30).

Previous cohort studies of patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis have shown that the majority of patients were women (N=468/577, 81%; median age: 21 years) (24). Furthermore, several case reports and a larger cohort study described anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in patients with first-episode psychosis (29). Compared with chronic patients, the likelihood of identifying carriers of CNS autoantibodies in patients with recent-onset severe psychiatric symptomatology is expected to be higher, especially when atypical psychiatric symptoms are present (29).

Compared with nonpuerperal psychosis, the characteristics of women with postpartum psychosis likely increases the a priori likelihood of NMDA receptor autoantibodies because these patients are female, generally young, and have first-onset episodes of atypical psychiatric symptoms, including delirium-like symptoms. In addition, following delivery, there is a well-described period of rebound immune activation, which has been widely implicated in the onset or exacerbation of multiple autoimmune disorders (37). For example, postpartum immune activation causes clinically significant increases in thyroid peroxidase antibody levels, with elevated rates of clinical thyroid dysfunction (38). The postpartum period is also a well-established period of substantially elevated risk for both first-onset and relapse episodes of autoimmune CNS diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (39). Accordingly, a similar mechanism could underlie anti-NMDA receptor autoantibody pathogenesis during the postpartum period.

Patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis often present with memory deficits, disorientation, and/or decreased consciousness. Furthermore, affective psychotic symptoms are relatively common. Postpartum psychosis is remarkable for having both features: an acute delirium-like appearance and prominent affective symptoms. Additionally, in the present study, both women with postpartum psychosis and anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies exhibited extrapyramidal symptoms with low-dose haloperidol, a clinical response that is not particularly common among patients with postpartum psychosis. Interestingly, in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, classical antipsychotics such as haloperidol seem to result in a high incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms, as well as the exacerbation of mild motor symptoms evident prior to antipsychotic treatment. Accordingly, we acknowledge the possibility that subtle neurological signs may have been unrecognized during the acute phase of the illness. Taken together, the acute onset of severe atypical psychiatric symptoms in young female patients should raise the index of suspicion for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, particularly when patients demonstrate neurological symptoms, including extrapyramidal side effects of low-dose antipsychotic treatment (40). Primary screening for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is most optimal when performed using CSF. The problem of false positives when using serum has been recently shown in several studies (34, 41, 42), thereby emphasizing the importance of confirming serum cell-based assay results with an independent methodology (e.g., immunohistochemistry with brain sections and/or live cultured neurons) (33, 42).

In conclusion, we recommend NMDA receptor autoantibody screening for all patients with the acute onset of a severe psychiatric illness comorbid with neurological symptoms, including seizures, decreased consciousness, dyskinesia, or overt motor symptoms. Furthermore, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis should be considered within the differential diagnosis for any patient with first-onset psychosis or mania, especially if multiple risk factors are present. The present study suggests that anti-NMDA receptor autoantibody screening should be considered in particular for patients with postpartum psychosis.

From the Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Service of Neurology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; the Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York; University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia; and Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Address correspondence to Dr. Bergink ().

Dr. Bergink is supported by an Erasmus University fellowship and has received funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Rubicon incentive). Dr. Armangue receives a personal grant from the Institutos Carlos III (CM14/00081). Dr. Titulaer has received support from an Erasmus MC fellowship, funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Veni incentive), and travel funds from Sun Pharma, India. Dr. Dalmau has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NINDS RO1NS077851 and NIMH RO1MH094741), Instituto Carlos III (14/00203), as well as a research grant from Euroimmun; he also holds a patent application for the use of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor as an autoantibody test and receives royalties from Euroimmun for the use of NMDA receptor, GABAB receptor, GABAA receptor, DPPX, and IgLON5 as diagnostic tests. Dr. Kushner has received funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Vidi incentive), the NeuroBasic-PharmaPhenomics consortium, and the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW, OnTime Program 12197). Dr. Markx reports no financial relationships with commercial interests.

The authors thank Esther Aguilar and Eva Caballero for their technical support and Mar Petit for assistance in the development of the images in Figure 1. The authors also thank Kathelijne Koorengevel for clinical care and Karin Burgerhout and Mirjam Timmermans for recruitment of the patients and healthy comparison subjects.

References

1 Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, et al.: New parents and mental disorders: a population-based register study. JAMA 2006; 296:2582–2589Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2 Spinelli MG: Postpartum psychosis: detection of risk and management. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:405–408LinkGoogle Scholar

3 Boyce P, Barriball E: Puerperal psychosis. Arch Women Ment Health 2010; 13:45–47Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Bergink V, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Koorengevel KM, et al.: First-onset psychosis occurring in the postpartum period: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72:1531–1537Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Wisner KL, Peindl K, Hanusa BH: Symptomatology of affective and psychotic illnesses related to childbearing. J Affect Disord 1994; 30:77–87Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Bergink V, Burgerhout KM, Weigelt K, et al.: Immune system dysregulation in first-onset postpartum psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73:1000–1007Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Gleicher N: Postpartum depression, an autoimmune disease? Autoimmun Rev 2007; 6:572–576Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8 Osborne LM, Monk C: Perinatal depression—the fourth inflammatory morbidity of pregnancy? theory and literature review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013; 38:1929–1952Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Bergink V, Kushner SA, Pop V, et al.: Prevalence of autoimmune thyroid dysfunction in postpartum psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 198:264–268Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Lancaster E, Dalmau J: Neuronal autoantigens—pathogenesis, associated disorders and antibody testing. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8:380–390Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, et al.: Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10:63–74Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12 Deakin J, Lennox BR, Zandi MS: Antibodies to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and other synaptic proteins in psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75:284–291Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13 Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, et al.: Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:1091–1098Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

14 Gresa-Arribas N, Titulaer MJ, Torrents A, et al.: Antibody titres at diagnosis and during follow-up of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:167–177Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15 Lai M, Hughes EG, Peng X, et al.: AMPA receptor antibodies in limbic encephalitis alter synaptic receptor location. Ann Neurol 2009; 65:424–434Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16 Petit-Pedrol M, Armangue T, Peng X, et al.: Encephalitis with refractory seizures, status epilepticus, and antibodies to the GABAA receptor: a case series, characterisation of the antigen, and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:276–286Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17 Boronat A, Gelfand JM, Gresa-Arribas N, et al.: Encephalitis and antibodies to dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein-6, a subunit of Kv4.2 potassium channels. Ann Neurol 2013; 73:120–128Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18 Dale RC, Merheb V, Pillai S, et al.: Antibodies to surface dopamine-2 receptor in autoimmune movement and psychiatric disorders. Brain 2012; 135:3453–3468Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

19 Hutchinson M, Waters P, McHugh J, et al.: Progressive encephalomyelitis, rigidity, and myoclonus: a novel glycine receptor antibody. Neurology 2008; 71:1291–1292Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

20 Buchhalter JR, Dichter MA: Electrophysiological comparison of pyramidal and stellate nonpyramidal neurons in dissociated cell culture of rat hippocampus. Brain Res Bull 1991; 26:333–338Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

21 Bergink V, Burgerhout KM, Koorengevel KM, et al: Treatment of psychosis and mania in the postpartum period. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172:115–123LinkGoogle Scholar

22 Bergink V, Bouvy PF, Vervoort JS, et al.: Prevention of postpartum psychosis and mania in women at high risk. Am J Psychiatry 2012; 169:609–615LinkGoogle Scholar

23 Carbone F, De Rosa V, Carrieri PB, et al.: Regulatory T cell proliferative potential is impaired in human autoimmune disease. Nat Med 2014; 20:69–74Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24 Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, et al.: Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:157–165Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

25 Yu AY, Moore FG: Paraneoplastic encephalitis presenting as postpartum psychosis. Psychosomatics 2011; 52:568–570Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26 Shaaban HS, Choo HF, Sensakovic JW: Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis presenting as postpartum psychosis in a young woman, treated with rituximab. Ann Saudi Med 2012; 32:421–423Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27 Koksal A, Baybas S, Mutluay B, et al.: A case of NMDAR encephalitis misdiagnosed as postpartum psychosis and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol Sci (Epub ahead of print, Sept 30, 2014)Google Scholar

28 Zandi MS, Irani SR, Lang B, et al.: Disease-relevant autoantibodies in first episode schizophrenia. J Neurol 2011; 258:686–688Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29 Kayser MS, Titulaer MJ, Gresa-Arribas N, et al.: Frequency and characteristics of isolated psychiatric episodes in anti–N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. JAMA Neurol 2013; 70:1133–1139Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30 Pollak TA, McCormack R, Peakman M, et al.: Prevalence of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antibodies in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2014; 12:2475–2487CrossrefGoogle Scholar

31 Steiner J, Walter M, Glanz W, et al.: Increased prevalence of diverse N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor antibodies in patients with an initial diagnosis of schizophrenia: specific relevance of IgG NR1a antibodies for distinction from N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor encephalitis. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:271–278Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32 Hammer C, Stepniak B, Schneider A, et al.: Neuropsychiatric disease relevance of circulating anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies depends on blood-brain barrier integrity. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19:1143–1149 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33 Kayser MS, Dalmau J: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, autoimmunity, and psychosis. Schizophr Res (Epub ahead of print, Oct 25, 2014) PubMedMedlineGoogle Scholar

34 Zandi MS, Paterson RW, Ellul MA, et al.: Clinical relevance of serum antibodies to extracellular N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor epitopes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:708–713Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35 Steiner J, Teegen B, Schiltz K, et al.: Prevalence of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor autoantibodies in the peripheral blood: healthy control samples revisited. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:838–839Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36 Dahm L, Ott C, Steiner J, et al.: Seroprevalence of autoantibodies against brain antigens in health and disease. Ann Neurol 2014; 76:82–94Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37 Buyon JP: The effects of pregnancy on autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol 1998; 63:281–287Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38 Weetman AP: Immunity, thyroid function and pregnancy: molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010; 6:311–318Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39 Hughes SE, Spelman T, Gray OM, et al.: MSBase Study Group: Predictors and dynamics of postpartum relapses in women with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014; 20:739–746Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

40 Titulaer MJ, Kayser MS, Dalmau J: Authors’ reply. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:425–426Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41 Viaccoz A, Desestret V, Ducray F, et al.: Clinical specificities of adult male patients with NMDA receptor antibodies encephalitis. Neurology 2014; 82:556–563Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

42 Armangue TSJ, Dalmau J: When a serum test overrides the clinical assessment. Neurology 2015; 84:1379–1381Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar