Patients' rights: a cultural challenge to Western psychiatry
Abstract
To some degree, all psychiatric encounters, by constraining behavioral variation and autonomous decision making, threaten a personhood already impaired by illness. The challenge presented by this and other factors in Western psychiatry is how to resolve the ethical dilemmas of justice, autonomy, and beneficence inherent in contemporary hospitalization and treatment practices for severely mentally ill persons. The author discusses this challenge in terms of the physician- patient contract, clinical standards for limiting autonomy, and the Kantian concept of equality of mutual respect. The legal code in relation to psychiatry has evolved into a contemporary interpreting mechanism for Kantian cultural tradition.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
