Uses and Abuses of Concepts in Psychiatry
Abstract
Although the vocabulary of psychiatry does not exceed that of many other disciplines in size, it is unusually fluid, changing rapidly from time to time and from place to place. Psychiatrists have thus been accused at times of overindulgence in terms and concepts. This author examines the ways in which some terms and concepts have come into usage, the functions they serve, and the ways in which they have influenced development in the field. He concludes that Adolf Meyer's "critical pragmatism" remains the most useful approach to the problem of conceptualization and classification in psychiatry.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
