BRIEF STIMULUS THERAPY
Abstract
1. Brief stimulus therapy was administered to 80 patients, 46 of whom had no other type of shock. In the latter group, patients with affective disorders were recovered in about 80% of cases; the remaining patients were all improved. In 20 schizophrenic patients, 45% of remissions were procured (with only a brief follow-up) and 2 patients were not improved. Both unimproved patients showed predominant hebephrenic features.
2. The assets of BST are the avoidance of memory disorders and of pronounced EEG changes; shorter postconvulsive recovery; facilitation of psychotherapy; and lower incidence of vertebral compressions.
3. The pitfalls of BST are all associated with an increased fear of treatments in some patients. This fear seems to be related to "unobliterated" minor reactions and an occurrence of "dissociated shocks." Different procedures are suggested to decrease such fear.
4. Physiological mechanisms underlying BST, its assets and its pitfalls, are reviewed, particularly the physiological meaning of "dissociated shock." Further possibilities of the refinement of BST on the basis of physiological analysis of excitabilities involved are suggested.
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Institutional Login
- Sign in via OpenAthens
- Register for access
-
Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.
Not a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).
