The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:1109-a-1110, June 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.6.1109-a
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by GANZINI, L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by GANZINI, L.
Related Collections
* Other Ethics Issues
* Dementias (General)
* Suicide

Letter to the Editor

Physician-Assisted Suicide

LINDA GANZINI, M.D., M.P.H.
Portland, Ore.

To the Editor: Studies support that psychiatrists’ ethical views on physician-assisted suicide clearly affect their clinical understanding of this practice (1). This bias is demonstrated in both the manner in which N. Gregory Hamilton, M.D., and Catherine A. Hamilton, M.A. (2) described cases of physician-assisted suicide and the Journal editors’ choice to publish the case report. Dr. and Ms. Hamilton stated that the law failed to protect "Kate Cheney, an 85-year-old cancer patient with growing dementia, whose psychiatrist believed she was being pressured by her family. Nevertheless, she was approved for an overdose by a psychologist" (p. 1061). I was the psychiatrist who determined that Ms. Cheney did not meet the requirements of the law, but concern regarding coercion was not the primary basis. This woman had mild, potentially reversible cognitive deficits that interfered with her ability to understand her options. I agreed with the need for a second opinion and assisted in finding a qualified mental health professional to give one. As noted by Grisso and Appelbaum (3), "A key element in attempting to maximize patient performance is delaying the final decision about their capacities...repeat evaluations are often helpful in distinguishing between time-limited and permanent impairments" (p. 92).

A second case mentioned was a patient who, according to Dr. and Ms. Hamilton, "also had been diagnosed with depression" (2, p. 1060) and was given a lethal prescription by Dr. B, "a known assisted suicide activist" (p. 1062). I interviewed (and audiotaped) the internist who made this supposed diagnosis. He clarified that ultimately he did not believe that the patient was depressed. He declined involvement because her "single-mindedness" in obtaining physician-assisted suicide made him uncomfortable. Several other physicians, including a psychiatrist whom I respect and who interviewed the patient and reviewed the case with me, could find no evidence of a DSM-based mood disorder. The only knowledge that Dr. and Ms. Hamilton had of both of these cases appears to be from Oregon newspaper accounts.

I am troubled and perplexed by the Journal’s choice of this single case report as representative of scientific discourse on physician-assisted suicide and the failure to consider the biases just exemplified. Dr. and Ms. Hamilton published this case with the patients’ and the physicians’ real names on their antieuthanasia website (4) in 2004. Permission was obtained from the family of Kate Cheney for this report in the Journal.

References

  1. Ganzini L, Leong GB, Fenn DS, Silva JA, Weinstock R: Evaluation of competence to consent to assisted suicide: views of forensic psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:595–600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hamilton NG, Hamilton CA: Competing paradigms of response to assisted suicide requests in Oregon. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1060–1065[Free Full Text]
  3. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS: Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
  4. Competing Paradigms of Responding to Assisted-Suicide Requests in Oregon: A Case Report. http://www.pccef.org/articles/art28



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
M. P Battin, A. van der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. van der Wal, and B. D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in "vulnerable" groups
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2007; 33(10): 591 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by GANZINI, L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by GANZINI, L.
Related Collections
* Other Ethics Issues
* Dementias (General)
* Suicide


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org