The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:943-a-944, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.943-a
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by BANZATO, C. E.M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by BANZATO, C. E.M.

Book Forum

Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis

by John Z. Sadler. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, 557 pp, $59.50.

CLAUDIO E.M. BANZATO, M.D., Ph.D.
Campinas, Brazil

The book series International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry, launched by Oxford University Press in 2003, represents yet another clear indication that the interdisciplinary field of philosophy of psychiatry has been flourishing lately. Perhaps the most distinctive mark of the recent work in this area is aiming not just at illuminating the intricate philosophical problems inevitably faced by psychiatry but also at doing something about it. In other words, philosophical analytical rigor has been put to the service of building a more sophisticated conceptual framework for psychiatry, which is much needed as ever, in order to keep pace with the myriad of scientific and humanistic developments of such discipline.

Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis by John Z. Sadler is an important and remarkable book for several reasons. First, it addresses a number of thorny and controversial issues regarding the many roles played by values in the classification of psychopathology (and correlate issues) in a thoughtful, balanced, and nonpolemic manner, as Sadler truly seeks to engage the reader in a constructive dialogue. Second, even though the scope of the book is broad, the scholarship displayed is impressive, as the work is richly referenced and annotated and the author strives to be as fair-minded as possible with respect to the conflicting viewpoints discussed. This does not prevent him, however, from presenting his own perspectives. Third, despite the fact that treating values in the aggregate is a very tall order, Sadler’s analytical skills allow him to move swiftly in the messy world of psychiatric classification; diagnostic finesse always pays off.

The main thrust of the book is to identify and unpack the values-commitments of the profession (enshrined in the diagnostic manuals, arguably its benchmarks), which according to him remain largely unrecognized as such. By values, Sadler means the concepts that we use to guide our actions and lead us to be deserving of praise or blame, but also and mainly the concepts we use to describe blame/praiseworthy and action-guiding activities (value-language as description). In a systematic fashion, the author applies throughout the book the distinctions between value-terms (encompassing both thick and thin ones), value-semantics, value-commitments, value-entailments, and value-consequences. A heuristic typology of values, comprising aesthetic, ethical, pragmatic, epistemic, and ontological values, is prolifically used as well. Furthermore, the scrutiny of the six ontological assumptions underlying the DSM effort—namely, empiricism, hyponarrativity, individualism, naturalism, pragmatism, and traditionalism—renders more understandable several key nosological controversies.

Drawing on the analogy between the social features of science (openness, equality of opportunity, peer review, epistemic freedom, and criticism) and democratic values, Sadler advances a forceful argument for good politics for psychiatric classification, politics taken in the sense of seeking and maintaining a moral vision of aiding the mentally ill. Accordingly, a strong case is made in favor of a broadly based diagnostic practice. In sum, by offering a tentative road map for conceptual challenges and value-inquiries that are likely to play a prominent role in the forthcoming revisions of ICD and DSM, this is a timely contribution to the further development of a sensible and pluralistic psychiatry.





This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by BANZATO, C. E.M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by BANZATO, C. E.M.


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org