The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:1838, October 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1838
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by BLOCK, J. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by BLOCK, J. J.
Related Collections
* Atypical Neuroleptics

Letter to the Editor

Ethical Concerns Regarding Olanzapine Versus Placebo in Patients Prodromally Symptomatic for Psychosis

JERALD J. BLOCK, M.D.
Portland, Ore.

To the Editor: I am concerned that the article entitled "Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Olanzapine Versus Placebo in Patients Prodromally Symptomatic for Psychosis" (1) lacked discussion regarding the ethics of treating young (average age=18.2 years) and nonpsychotic patients with the neuroleptic olanzapine for 1 year.

The authors anticipated this problem, and, as they point out, in prior studies 46%–80% of those labeled "prodromal" never develop schizophrenia after up to 2 years of observation and were probably false positives (p. 797). In their study, 16 of 29 participants (55%) in the placebo group never became psychotic after 2 years. We should, therefore, expect that approximately 17 of the 31 (55%) subjects who were given olanzapine were also false positives. More than one-half of the patients who were prescribed olanzapine were exposed to it unnecessarily—at doses ranging from 5 to 15 mg/day.

In addition to the patients’ average weight gain of 19 lbs, I am concerned with what other biopsychosocial repercussions there were for these young men and women after they were placed on the neuroleptic, without a clear indication, for a year. Isn’t our first and foremost obligation to "do no harm"?

Reference

  1. McGlashan TH, Zipursky RB, Perkins D, Addington, J, Miller T, Woods SW, Hawkins KA, Hoffman RE, Preda A, Epstein I, Addington D, Lindborg S, Trzaskoma Q, Tohen M, Breier A: Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:790–799[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by BLOCK, J. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by BLOCK, J. J.
Related Collections
* Atypical Neuroleptics


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org