The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by CROW, T.J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by CROW, T.J.
Related Collections
* Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
* Epidemiology
Am J Psychiatry 160:1011-1012, May 2003
© 2003 American Psychiatric Association


Letter to the Editor

Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia

T.J. CROW, Ph.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.C.Psych., F.Med.Sci.
Oxford, U.K.

To the Editor: In a meta-analysis of prospective population-based studies, Mary Cannon, M.D., Ph.D., M.R.C.Psych., et al. (1) reported that three classes of complications were "significantly associated with schizophrenia: 1) complications of pregnancy (bleeding, diabetes, rhesus incompatibility, preeclampsia); 2) abnormal fetal growth and development: (low birth weight, congenital malformations, reduced head circumference), and 3) complications of delivery (uterine atony, asphyxia, emergency Cesarean section)" (p. 1080). Thus, there are no less than 10 factors of etiological significance for schizophrenia. But how could so diverse a list of factors all have the same effect? If any one were relevant, why would it not stand out, given proband versus healthy comparison groups of 1,923 and 527,925 births, respectively?

The authors wrote, "The findings from the population-based studies were mostly negative and surprisingly contradictory" (p. 1082) and recognized that case-control studies are not free from potential bias. One such bias in a previous study (2) that suggested eclampsia was a risk factor was detected and scrupulously corrected with negative conclusions by Kendell et al. (3). Failure to document blindness in case selection (4) was a feature of a study that suggested that asphyxia was relevant (5): for this putative risk factor, the meta-analysis detected significant heterogeneity of outcome between studies (Q=12.56, df=2, p=0.005). Yet in the case of each of these factors, Dr. Cannon et al. drew positive conclusions, in some cases calling on evidence, e.g., the meta-analysis of Geddes and Lawrie (6), that included studies that are clearly vulnerable to biases, e.g., maternal recall, in addition to those of case-control studies. The authors discussed pathophysiological theories (1, pp. 1083–1087) for each class of agent as though a causal relationship were established, although for any given factor, the majority of the studies included adequate and sometimes detailed records of the event in question and failed to detect an association.

The authors’ inability to draw the obvious conclusion that the etiology of psychosis is simply unrelated to complications of pregnancy and birth is reflected in the complaint that "lack of statistical power to measure small and interactive effects...are major problems with current approaches" (1, p. 1080). In their relentless pursuit of a positive conclusion, Dr. Cannon et al. demonstrated that meta-analysis can be deployed as a sophisticated instrument of data torture (7).

References

  1. Cannon M, Jones PB, Murray RM: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: historical and meta-analytic review. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:1080-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kendell RE, Juszczak E, Cole SK: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: a case control study based on standardised obstetric records. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168:556-561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kendell RE, McInneny K, Juszczak E, Bain M: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: two case-control studies based on structured obstetric records. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176:516-522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Crow TJ, McIntosh AM, Lawrie SM: Invited commentaries on: signs of asphyxia at birth and risk of schizophrenia/obstetric complications and risk of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 179:415-416[Free Full Text]
  5. Dalman C, Thomas HV, David AS, Gentz J, Lewis G, Allebeck P: Signs of asphyxia at birth and risk of schizophrenia: population-based case-control study. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 179:403-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Geddes JR, Lawrie SM: Obstetric complications and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 167:786-793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mills JL: Data torturing. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1196-1199[Free Full Text]




This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by CROW, T.J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by CROW, T.J.
Related Collections
* Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
* Epidemiology


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2003 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org