The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by GUTHEIL, T. G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by GUTHEIL, T. G.
Related Collections
* Miscellaneous Ethics
* Other Psychotherapy
Am J Psychiatry 159:878, May 2002
© 2002 American Psychiatric Association


Letter to the Editor

Posttermination Boundary Issues

THOMAS G. GUTHEIL, M.D.
Boston, Mass.

To the Editor: The excellent article by Drs. Malmquist and Notman provided a needed critical examination of the legal system’s use and misuse of the clinical concept of transference. As an expert witness in more than 250 cases of boundary violations/sexual misconduct, I have also been impressed with the curious tendency of both courts and boards of registration to treat transference as tantamount to a finding of incompetence, although I profess that an undue-influence model is plausible and often accurate (1). The latter model is at least more respectful of patient autonomy.

The article seemed to omit a central issue, however—economics. To have sex with a past or present patient is an intentional act, hence, an intentional tort, which precludes coverage by malpractice insurance. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have had two choices in making such cases triable: 1) stressing the other negligences commonly found in such cases (2) or 2) "creating" a negligent (insurable) tort by claiming mismanagement of the transference, a form of (insurable) negligence. Legal precedent has then enshrined the centrality of a transference analysis, even when it does not fit, as Drs. Malmquist and Notman so effectively pointed out.

References

  1. Gutheil TG: Patient-therapist sexual relations. Harv Health Lett 1989; 6:4-6
  2. Jorgenson L, Bisbing SB, Sutherland PK: Therapist-patient sexual exploitation and insurance liability. Tort and Insurance Law J 1992; 27:595-614




This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by GUTHEIL, T. G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by GUTHEIL, T. G.
Related Collections
* Miscellaneous Ethics
* Other Psychotherapy


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org