The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by ROST, K. M.
* Articles by FORTNEY, J. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by ROST, K. M.
* Articles by FORTNEY, J. C.
Related Collections
* Depression
Am J Psychiatry 157:152, January 2000
© 2000 American Psychiatric Association


Letter to the Editor

Dr. Rost and Colleagues Reply

KATHRYN M. ROST, PH.D., MINGLIANG ZHANG, PH.D., and JOHN C. FORTNEY, PH.D.
Little Rock, Ark.

To the Editor: In our article, we reported greater cost savings for patients treated by psychiatric specialists than for those treated in the general medical sector. One explanation for this is that 48% of the community residents treated for depression in the specialty care sector received guideline-concordant care in contrast to 21% of the community residents treated for depression in the primary care setting. In his letter, Dr. Muskin requested further information to identify where the deviations from guideline-concordant care occurred in both sectors. We are happy to provide a further breakdown without extensive statistical comparisons. Specialty care patients were more likely than primary care patients to get any antidepressant medication (64.3% and 53.0%, respectively). Among those who received antidepressant medication, specialty care patients were more likely than primary care patients to be prescribed a guideline-concordant dose (52.8% and 39.4%) and were somewhat more likely to take the medication for a minimum of 8 weeks (75.0% and 70.5%). The remaining difference in guideline-concordant treatment rates was explained by the greater likelihood for specialty care patients to report that they received eight or more counseling visits for depression. The 1992 medication patterns do not adequately represent current primary care medication prescribing patterns, particularly the greater use of newer-generation antidepressants whose limited side effects allow physicians to prescribe therapeutic doses more readily. However, if specialty care’s achievement of better outcomes is in part attributable to providing psychotherapy (in combination with medication or independently), we might continue to observe these outcome differences if the study were to be replicated in the current health care environment.





This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by ROST, K. M.
* Articles by FORTNEY, J. C.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by ROST, K. M.
* Articles by FORTNEY, J. C.
Related Collections
* Depression


Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org