Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: AJP CME Course for January 2009: Toward Validation of the Diagnosis of Post... Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by North, C. S. Articles by Smith, R. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by North, C. S. Articles by Smith, R. P. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder DSM Genetics

Toward Validation of the Diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Unlike most psychiatric diagnoses, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is defined in relation to a potentially etiologic event (the traumatic "stressor criterion") that is fundamental to its conceptualization. The diagnosis of PTSD thus inherently depends on two separate but confounded processes: exposure to trauma and development of a specific pattern of symptoms that appear following the trauma. Attempts to define the range of trauma exposure inherent in the diagnosis of PTSD have generated controversy, as reflected in successive revisions of the criterion from DSM-III onward. It is still not established whether or not there are specific types of traumatic events and levels of exposure to them that are associated with a syndrome that is cohesive in clinical characteristics, biological correlates, familial patterns, and longitudinal diagnostic stability. On the other hand, the symptomatic description of PTSD is becoming more clear. Of three categories of symptoms associated with PTSD—intrusive memories, avoidance and numbing, and hyperarousal—avoidance and numbing appear to be the most specific for identification of PTSD. Research is now poised to answer questions about the relevance of traumatic events based on their relationship to symptomatic outcome. The authors recommend that future research begin with existing diagnostic criteria, testing and further refining them in accordance with the classic Robins and Guze strategy for validation of psychiatric diagnoses. In this process, diligent adherence to the criteria under examination is paramount to successful PTSD research, and changes in criteria are driven by empirical data rather than theory. Collaborations among trauma research biologists, epidemiologists, and nosologists to map the correspondence between the clinical and biological indicators of psychopathology are necessary to advance validation and further understanding of PTSD.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Stein and T. W. McAllister Exploring the Convergence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2009; 166(7): 768 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J.G. ASMUNDSON and S. TAYLOR PTSD Diagnostic Criteria: Understanding Etiology and Treatment Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 166(6): 726 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. PIETRZAK and S. M. SOUTHWICK The Importance of Four-Factor Emotional Numbing and Dysphoria Models in PTSD Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 166(6): 726 - 727. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Bibliography for PTSD and Disaster Psychiatry Focus, April 1, 2009; 7(2): 214 - 216. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Abstracts: PTSD and Disaster Psychiatry Focus, April 1, 2009; 7(2): 217 - 220. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us