Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Bloch, M. H. Articles by Leckman, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Bloch, M. H. Articles by Leckman, J. F. Child/Adolescent Psychiatry Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder DSM

Meta-Analysis of the Symptom Structure of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

OBJECTIVE: OCD is a clinically heterogeneous condition. This heterogeneity has the potential to reduce power in genetic, neuroimaging, and clinical trials. Despite a mounting number of studies, there remains debate regarding the exact factor structure of OCD symptoms. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to determine the factor structure of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Symptom Checklist. METHOD: Studies were included if they involved subjects with OCD and included an exploratory factor analysis of the 13 Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Symptom Checklist categories or the items therein. A varimax-rotation was conducted in SAS 9.1 using the PROC FACTOR CORR to extract factors from sample-size weighted co-occurrence matrices. Stratified meta-analysis was conducted to determine the factor structure of OCD in studies involving children and adults separately. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies involving 5,124 participants were included. The four factors generated were 1) symmetry: symmetry obsessions and repeating, ordering, and counting compulsions; 2) forbidden thoughts: aggression, sexual, religious, and somatic obsessions and checking compulsions, 3) cleaning: cleaning and contamination, and 4) hoarding: hoarding obsessions and compulsions. Factor analysis of studies including adults yielded an identical factor structure compared to the overall meta-analysis. Factor analysis of child-only studies differed in that checking loaded highest on the symmetry factor and somatic obsessions, on the cleaning factor. CONCLUSIONS: A four-factor structure explained a large proportion of the heterogeneity in the clinical symptoms of OCD. Further item-level factor analyses are needed to determine the appropriate placement of miscellaneous somatic and checking OCD symptoms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. H. Bloch, B. G. Craiglow, A. Landeros-Weisenberger, P. A. Dombrowski, K. E. Panza, B. S. Peterson, and J. F. Leckman Predictors of Early Adult Outcomes in Pediatric-Onset Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): 1085 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. PINTO, B. D. GREENBERG, D. L. MURPHY, G. NESTADT, and S. A. RASMUSSEN Using Individual Items to Clarify OCD Symptom Structure: The Case for Five Factors Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 166(6): 728 - 729. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Stein Worrying About Obsessions and Compulsions Am J Psychiatry, March 1, 2009; 166(3): 271 - 273. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us