
Am J Psychiatry 164:557-565, April 2007
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.557
© 2007 American Psychiatric Association
Psychiatric Disorders: A Conceptual Taxonomy
Peter Zachar, Ph.D., and
Kenneth S. Kendler, M.D.
This article summarizes six conceptual dimensions that underlie common assumptions about what counts as an adequate category of psychiatric disorder. These dimensions are 1) causalism-descriptivism, 2) essentialism-nominalism, 3) objectivism-evaluativism, 4) internalism-externalism, 5) entities-agents, and 6) categories-continua. Four different versions of the medical model are described and compared with respect to these dimensions. The medical models vary in several ways, but all can be considered "essentialistic." As a counter to the essentialist homogeneity among the medical models, two nominalist analyses of psychiatric classification are reviewed. In order to fill out the space defined by the conceptual dimensions, two alternatives to medical model approaches are also described. After making some suggestions about where DSM-V might best be aligned with respect to the conceptual dimensions, the authors review the distinction between empirical and nonempirical aspects of classificationand argue that nonempirical aspects of classification are legitimate and necessary.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Kendler, P. S. Appelbaum, C. C. BELL, K. W.M. Fulford, S. N. Ghaemi, K. F. Schaffner, G. S. Waterman, M. B. First, and J. Z. Sadler
Issues for DSM-V: DSM-V Should Include a Conceptual Issues Work Group
Am J Psychiatry,
February 1, 2008;
165(2):
174 - 175.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Reviews of Note
Journal Watch Psychiatry,
June 18, 2007;
2007(618):
1 - 1.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|