Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Eranti, S. Articles by McLoughlin, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Eranti, S. Articles by McLoughlin, D. M. Depression ECT Other Somatic Therapy

A Randomized, Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-Up of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroconvulsive Therapy for Severe Depression

OBJECTIVE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to be as effective as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depression. The authors conducted a multicenter randomized, controlled trial to test the equivalence of rTMS with ECT. METHOD: Forty-six patients with major depression referred for ECT were randomly assigned to either a 15-day course of rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (N=24) or a standard course of ECT (N=22). The primary outcome measures were the score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the proportion of patients with remissions (Hamilton score, 8) at the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included mood self-ratings on the Beck Depression Inventory-II and visual analogue mood scales, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score, and both self-reported and observer-rated cognitive changes. The patients were followed up after 6 months. RESULTS: HAM-D scores at the end of treatment were significantly lower for ECT, with 13 patients (59.1%) achieving remission in the ECT group and four (16.7%) in the rTMS group. However, at 6 months the HAM-D scores did not differ between groups. Beck scale, visual analogue mood scale, and BPRS scores were lower for ECT at the end of treatment and remained lower after 6 months. Self- and observer-rated cognitive measures were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: rTMS was not as effective as ECT, and ECT was substantially more effective for the short-term treatment of depression.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Anderson, I. Ferrier, R. Baldwin, P. Cowen, L Howard, G Lewis, K Matthews, R. McAllister-Williams, R. Peveler, J Scott, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2008; 22(4): 343 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. B Fitzgerald Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is not as effective as electroconvulsive therapy for major depression Evid. Based Ment. Health, August 1, 2007; 10(3): 78 - 78. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fink and M. A. Taylor Electroconvulsive Therapy: Evidence and Challenges JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 330 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. JANICAK, S. DOWD, J. RADO, M. J. WELCH, L. FOGG, J. O'REARDON, D. AVERY, C. E. COFFEY, S. SAMPSON, and N. BOUTROS Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy: Efficacy of Treatment in Nonpsychotic Patients With Depression Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 164(7): 1118 - 1118. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Disappointing Results for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Compared with ECT Journal Watch Psychiatry, February 12, 2007; 2007(212): 2 - 2. [Full Text]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2007 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us