The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:1419-1425, August 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.8.1419
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Roy-Byrne, P.
* Articles by Sullivan, G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Roy-Byrne, P.
* Articles by Sullivan, G.
Related Collections
* Primary Care
* Panic Disorder
* Other Patient Groups/Issues

Poverty and Response to Treatment Among Panic Disorder Patients in Primary Care

Peter Roy-Byrne, M.D., Cathy Sherbourne, M.D., Jeanne Miranda, Ph.D., Murray Stein, M.D., M.P.H., Michelle Craske, Ph.D., Daniela Golinelli, Ph.D., and Greer Sullivan, M.D., M.S.Ph.

OBJECTIVE: Despite well-established links between poverty and poor mental illness outcome as well as recent reports exploring racial and ethnic health disparities, little is known about the outcomes of evidence-based psychiatric treatment for poor individuals. METHOD: Primary care patients with panic disorder (N=232) who were participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing a cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy intervention to usual care were divided into those patients above (N=152) and below (N=80) the poverty line. Telephone assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were used to compare the amount of evidence-based care received as well as clinical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Poor subjects were more severely ill at baseline, with more medical and psychiatric comorbidity. The increases in the amount of evidence-based care and reductions in clinical symptoms and disability were comparable in the two groups such that poorer individuals, although responding equivalently, continued to be more ill and disabled at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The comparable response of poor individuals in this study suggests that standard CBT and pharmacotherapy treatments for panic disorder do not need to be "tailored" to be effective in poor populations. However, the more severe illness both at baseline and follow-up in these poor individuals suggests that treatment programs may need to be extended in order to treat residual symptoms and disability in these patients so that they might achieve comparable levels of remission.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
M. Cruz, J. Scott, P. Houck, C. F. Reynolds III, E. Frank, and M. K. Shear
Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcome of African Americans With Complicated Grief
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2007; 58(5): 700 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch PsychiatryHome page
Is Treating Panic Disorder a Class Act?
Journal Watch Psychiatry, September 25, 2006; 2006(925): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org