The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:919-926, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.919
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Data Supplement
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Roffman, J. L.
* Articles by Ernst, C. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Roffman, J. L.
* Articles by Ernst, C. L.
Related Collections
* General Topics in Psychiatry
* Other Neuroscience

Neuroscience in Psychiatry Training: How Much Do Residents Need To Know?

Joshua L. Roffman, M.D., Asher B. Simon, M.D., Konasale M. Prasad, M.D., Christine J. Truman, M.D., Jason Morrison, M.D., and Carrie L. Ernst, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: With the explosion of research in psychiatric neuroscience, the extent and means by which neuroscientific progress will translate into clinical care remains largely uncertain. The authors sought to determine how this dilemma is currently being played out in residency training programs, in which training directors must decide how best to integrate neuroscience teaching in a rapidly changing clinical landscape. METHOD: The authors surveyed U.S. and Canadian psychiatry residency training directors to characterize current and future trends in neuroscience education and to examine training directors’ views on the relevance of neuroscience to clinical practice. RESULTS: The amount of neuroscience in residency curricula has increased significantly over the past 5 years, and further increases are expected in each specific neuroscience content area examined. While most training directors agreed that training in neuroscience was important for all residents, even those becoming primarily psychotherapists, relevance to future (but not current) practice was consistently cited as a motivating factor. CONCLUSIONS: While psychiatric residency programs continue to increase the neuroscience content of their curricula, it remains unclear how this added training will influence clinical work. Reframing current practices, including psychotherapy, into a neuroscientific context may ultimately prove more useful to trainees.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
M. T. Wright
Training Psychiatrists in Nonpsychiatric Medicine: What Do Our Patients and Our Profession Need?
Acad Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 181 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org