The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:913-918, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.913
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Miresco, M. J.
* Articles by Kirmayer, L. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Miresco, M. J.
* Articles by Kirmayer, L. J.
Related Collections
* General Topics in Psychiatry
* Other Diagnostic Tools
* Symptoms/Dimensions
* Cognition

The Persistence of Mind-Brain Dualism in Psychiatric Reasoning About Clinical Scenarios

Marc J. Miresco, M.D., and Laurence J. Kirmayer, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.

OBJECTIVE: Despite attempts in psychiatry to adopt an integrative biopsychosocial model, social scientists have observed that psychiatrists continue to operate according to a mind-brain dichotomy in ways that are often covert and unacknowledged and suggest that the same intuitive cognitive schemas that people use to make judgments of responsibility lead to dualistic reasoning among clinicians. The goal of this study was to confirm these observations. METHOD: Self-report questionnaires were sent to the 270 psychiatrists and psychologists in the Department of Psychiatry at McGill University. In response to clinical vignettes, the participants rated the level of intentionality, controllability, responsibility, and blame attributable to the patients, as well as the importance of neurobiological, psychological, and social factors in explaining the patients’ symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 136 faculty members (50.4%) responded, and 127 were included in the analysis. Factor analysis revealed a single dimension of responsibility regarding the patients’ illnesses that correlated positively with ratings of psychological etiology and negatively with ratings of neurobiological etiology. Psychological and neurobiological ratings were inversely correlated. Multivariate analyses of variance supported these results. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health professionals continue to employ a mind-brain dichotomy when reasoning about clinical cases. The more a behavioral problem is seen as originating in "psychological" processes, the more a patient tends to be viewed as responsible and blameworthy for his or her symptoms; conversely, the more behaviors are attributed to neurobiological causes, the less likely patients are to be viewed as responsible and blameworthy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
L. J. Kirmayer
Psychotherapy and the Cultural Concept of the Person
Transcultural Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 44(2): 232 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. MOSSMAN and S. J. MORSE
Mind-Brain Dualism in Psychiatric Reasoning
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2006; 163(11): 2017 - 2017.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org