The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 163:822-826, May 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.822
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Gunderson, J. G.
* Articles by Stout, R. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Gunderson, J. G.
* Articles by Stout, R. L.
Related Collections
* Child/Adolescent Psychiatry
* Borderline Personality Disorders
* Other Personality Disorders
* Symptoms/Dimensions
* Child Abuse

Predictors of 2-Year Outcome for Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

John G. Gunderson, M.D., Maria T. Daversa, Ph.D., Carlos M. Grilo, Ph.D., Thomas H. McGlashan, M.D., Mary C. Zanarini, Ed.D., M. Tracie Shea, Ph.D., Andrew E. Skodol, M.D., Shirley Yen, Ph.D., Charles A. Sanislow, Ph.D., Donna S. Bender, Ph.D., Ingrid R. Dyck, M.P.H., Leslie C. Morey, Ph.D., and Robert L. Stout, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this report was to investigate whether characteristics of subjects with borderline personality disorder observed at baseline can predict variations in outcome at the 2-year follow-up. METHOD: Hypothesized predictor variables were selected from prior studies. The patients (N=160) were recruited from the four clinical sites of the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders; the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders, a modified version of that instrument; the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation; and the Childhood Experiences Questionnaire–Revised. Univariate Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated on the primary predictor variables, and with two forward stepwise regression models, outcome was assessed with global functioning and number of borderline personality disorder criteria. RESULTS: The authors’ most significant results confirm prior findings that more severe baseline psychopathology (i.e., higher levels of borderline personality disorder criteria and functional disability) and a history of childhood trauma predict a poor outcome. A new finding suggests that the quality of current relationships of patients with borderline personality disorder have prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can estimate 2-year prognosis for patients with borderline personality disorder by evaluating level of severity of psychopathology, childhood trauma, and current relationships.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. Bateman and P. Fonagy
8-Year Follow-Up of Patients Treated for Borderline Personality Disorder: Mentalization-Based Treatment Versus Treatment as Usual
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 165(5): 631 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org