Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Drozd, E. M. Articles by Goldman, H. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Drozd, E. M. Articles by Goldman, H. H. Costs, Cost Analysis Hospitals, Hospital Treatment

Patient Casemix Classification for Medicare Psychiatric Prospective Payment

OBJECTIVE: For a proposed Medicare prospective payment system for inpatient psychiatric facility treatment, the authors developed a casemix classification to capture differences in patients’ real daily resource use. METHOD: Primary data on patient characteristics and daily time spent in various activities were collected in a survey of 696 patients from 40 inpatient psychiatric facilities. Survey data were combined with Medicare claims data to estimate intensity-adjusted daily cost. Classification and Regression Trees (CART) analysis of average daily routine and ancillary costs yielded several hierarchical classification groupings. Regression analysis was used to control for facility and day-of-stay effects in order to compare hierarchical models with models based on the recently proposed payment system of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. RESULTS: CART analysis identified a small set of patient characteristics strongly associated with higher daily costs, including age, psychiatric diagnosis, deficits in daily living activities, and detox or ECT use. A parsimonious, 16-group, fully interactive model that used five major DSM-IV categories and stratified by age, illness severity, deficits in daily living activities, dangerousness, and use of ECT explained 40% (out of a possible 76%) of daily cost variation not attributable to idiosyncratic daily changes within patients. A noninteractive model based on diagnosis-related groups, age, and medical comorbidity had explanatory power of only 32%. CONCLUSIONS: A regression model with 16 casemix groups restricted to using "appropriate" payment variables (i.e., those with clinical face validity and low administrative burden that are easily validated and provide proper care incentives) produced more efficient and equitable payments than did a noninteractive system based on diagnosis-related groups.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Liptzin, G. L. Gottlieb, and P. Summergrad The Future of Psychiatric Services in General Hospitals Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 164(10): 1468 - 1472. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Cromwell and J. Maier Economic Grand Rounds: Variation in Staffing and Activities in Psychiatric Inpatient Units Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2006; 57(6): 772 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us