Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Swanson, J. W. Articles by Kim, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Swanson, J. W. Articles by Kim, M. Other Forensic Issues Crisis and Emergency Treatment Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Facilitated Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Randomized Trial of an Intervention to Foster Advance Treatment Planning Among Persons with Severe Mental Illness

OBJECTIVE: Studies show a high potential demand for psychiatric advance directives but low completion rates. The authors conducted a randomized study of a structured, manualized intervention to facilitate completion of psychiatric advance directives. METHOD: A total of 469 patients with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to a facilitated psychiatric advance directive session or a control group that received written information about psychiatric advance directives and referral to resources in the public mental health system. Completion of an advance directive, its structure and content, and its short-term effects on working alliance and treatment satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of participants in the facilitated session completed an advance directive or authorized a proxy decision maker, compared with only 3% of control group participants. Psychiatrists rated the advance directives as highly consistent with standards of community practice. Most participants used the advance directive to refuse some medications and to express preferences for admission to specific hospitals and not others, although none used an advance directive to refuse all treatment. At 1-month follow-up, participants in the facilitated session had a greater working alliance with their clinicians and were more likely than those in the control group to report receiving the mental health services they believed they needed. CONCLUSIONS: The facilitation session is an effective method of helping patients complete psychiatric advance directives and ensuring that the documents contain useful information about patients’ treatment preferences. Achieving the promise of psychiatric advance directives may require system-level policies to embed facilitation of these instruments in usual-care care settings.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Henderson, J. W. Swanson, G. Szmukler, G. Thornicroft, and M. Zinkler A Typology of Advance Statements in Mental Health Care Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2008; 59(1): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Van Citters, U. Naidoo, and M. E. Foti Using a Hypothetical Scenario to Inform Psychiatric Advance Directives Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2007; 58(11): 1467 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Wilder, E. B. Elbogen, M. S. Swartz, J. W. Swanson, and R. A. Van Dorn Effect of Patients' Reasons for Refusing Treatment on Implementing Psychiatric Advance Directives Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2007; 58(10): 1348 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Swartz and J. W. Swanson Commentary: Psychiatric Advance Directives and Recovery-Oriented Care Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 2007; 58(9): 1164 - 1164. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us