Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Beals, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Beals, J. Cross-Cultural Psychiatry Minority Issues Depression Diagnostic Criteria Interviews

Prevalence of Major Depressive Episode in Two American Indian Reservation Populations: Unexpected Findings With a Structured Interview

American Indian Service Utilization, Psychiatric Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors Project Team

OBJECTIVE: American Indian populations have often been considered to be at greater risk for major depressive episode than are other groups in the United States. The American Indian Service Utilization, Psychiatric Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors Project (AI-SUPERPFP), completed between 1997 and 1999, was designed to allow comparisons with the baseline National Comorbidity Survey (NCS), conducted in 1990–1992. The prevalence of lifetime and 12-month DSM-III-R major depressive episode was compared between the AI-SUPERPFP and NCS samples. METHOD: A total of 3,084 tribal members (1,446 in a Southwest tribe [73.7% of eligible participants] and 1,638 in a Northern Plains tribe [76.8% of eligible participants]) age 15–54 years living on or near their home reservations were interviewed. An adaptation of the University of Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the NCS algorithm for diagnosis were used to estimate the prevalence of lifetime and 12-month major depressive episode in these groups. RESULTS: The prevalence estimates for lifetime and 12-month major depressive episode were substantially lower in the American Indian samples, compared to the NCS sample. Detailed analyses indicated differential endorsement of lifetime symptoms between the American Indian groups and the NCS participants. Furthermore, American Indians were substantially less likely than NCS participants to indicate that depressive symptoms had co-occurred during an episode lasting at least 2 weeks. The lifetime prevalence estimates based on the NCS algorithm ranged from 3.8% to 7.9% for men and women in the two tribes. The analogous rates based on an adapted AI-SUPERPFP algorithm ranged from 7.2% and 14.3%. Few tribe, age, and gender differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the need for careful examination of diagnostic instruments cross-culturally. Adaptation of the NCS algorithm for diagnosis appears necessary for estimation of the prevalence of major depressive episode in the American Indian populations included in this study. In striving to better reflect the clinical diagnostic process in epidemiological and services research, careful consideration of the resulting complexity becomes increasingly critical.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Jiang, J. Beals, N. R. Whitesell, Y. Roubideaux, S. M. Manson, and for the AI-SUPERPFP Team Association Between Diabetes and Mental Disorders in Two American Indian Reservation Communities Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): 2228 - 2229. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Beals, D. K. Novins, N. R. Whitesell, P. Spicer, C. M. Mitchell, S. M. Manson, and American Indian Service Utilization, Psychiatric E Prevalence of Mental Disorders and Utilization of Mental Health Services in Two American Indian Reservation Populations: Mental Health Disparities in a National Context Am J Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 162(9): 1723 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us