
Am J Psychiatry 162:2389-2391, December 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2389
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
Research Advance Directives: Protection or Obstacle?
Palaniappan Muthappan, B.S.,
Heidi Forster, J.D., and
David Wendler, Ph.D.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed how many adults completed a research advance directive and the preferences indicated on the completed forms. METHOD: The authors analyzed all 2,371 adults admitted as inpatients to the NIH Clinical Center from March 14 to Sept. 13, 2000. RESULTS: Overall, 11% of adult inpatients completed a research advance directive. Of those who specified preferences, 13% were not willing to participate in future research should they become unable to consent, 76% were willing to participate in research that might help them, 49% were willing to participate in research that would not help them and posed minimal risk, and 9% were willing to participate in research that would not help them and posed greater than minimal risk. CONCLUSIONS: Proposals to allow cognitively impaired adults to participate in research only with a formal advance directive could block important research. More flexible approaches should be considered to protect these individuals.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Chen
Why surrogate consent is important: A role for data in refining ethics policy and practice
Neurology,
November 11, 2008;
71(20):
1562 - 1563.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Chen, J. F. Meschia, T. G. Brott, R. D. Brown, B. B. Worrall, and for the SWISS investigators
Stroke Genetic Research and Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity: A Survey of IRB and Investigator Practices
Stroke,
October 1, 2008;
39(10):
2732 - 2735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|