The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 162:2389-2391, December 2005
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2389
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Muthappan, P.
* Articles by Wendler, D.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Muthappan, P.
* Articles by Wendler, D.
Related Collections
* Informed Consent
* Cognition

Brief Report

Research Advance Directives: Protection or Obstacle?

Palaniappan Muthappan, B.S., Heidi Forster, J.D., and David Wendler, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed how many adults completed a research advance directive and the preferences indicated on the completed forms. METHOD: The authors analyzed all 2,371 adults admitted as inpatients to the NIH Clinical Center from March 14 to Sept. 13, 2000. RESULTS: Overall, 11% of adult inpatients completed a research advance directive. Of those who specified preferences, 13% were not willing to participate in future research should they become unable to consent, 76% were willing to participate in research that might help them, 49% were willing to participate in research that would not help them and posed minimal risk, and 9% were willing to participate in research that would not help them and posed greater than minimal risk. CONCLUSIONS: Proposals to allow cognitively impaired adults to participate in research only with a formal advance directive could block important research. More flexible approaches should be considered to protect these individuals.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. T. Chen
Why surrogate consent is important: A role for data in refining ethics policy and practice
Neurology, November 11, 2008; 71(20): 1562 - 1563.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. T. Chen, J. F. Meschia, T. G. Brott, R. D. Brown, B. B. Worrall, and for the SWISS investigators
Stroke Genetic Research and Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity: A Survey of IRB and Investigator Practices
Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2732 - 2735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org