Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Appelbaum, P. S. Articles by Karlawish, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Appelbaum, P. S. Articles by Karlawish, J. H. Alzheimer's Disease Tests Related Article

The Capacity to Vote of Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease

OBJECTIVE: The right to vote can be abrogated when persons become incompetent to cast a ballot. This applies particularly to people with Alzheimer’s disease, who at some point will lose capacity. A 2001 federal court decision offered the first clear criteria ("Doe voting capacity standard") for determining voting competence, focused on understanding the nature and effect of voting and on the ability to choose. This article explores how persons with Alzheimer’s disease perform on these criteria. METHOD: The Doe standard was operationalized in a brief questionnaire, along with measures of appreciation and reasoning about voting choices. Performance was assessed in 33 patients attending an Alzheimer’s disease clinic and was related to dementia severity and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: The interview questions were scored with high reliability. Performance on the Doe questions, along with appreciation and reasoning, correlated strongly with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Patients with very mild to mild Alzheimer’s disease generally retained adequate ability to vote, and most persons with severe Alzheimer’s disease did not. Performance was highly variable among persons with moderate Alzheimer’s disease. The desire to vote was a poor predictor of voting capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The capacity to vote, as embodied in the Doe voting capacity standard, can be measured simply and reliably. Structured assessment is particularly likely to be useful for people with moderate Alzheimer’s disease, whose performance cannot be predicted from MMSE scores alone. This approach can ensure retention of voting rights by capable persons and exclusion of clearly impaired persons from the voting booth.

Related Article:

In This Issue
Am J Psychiatry 2005 162: A56. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Bosch-Domenech, R. Nagel, and J. V. Sanchez-Andres Prosocial Capabilities in Alzheimer's Patients J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, May 25, 2009; (2009) gbp034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Raad, J. Karlawish, and P. S. Appelbaum The Capacity to Vote of Persons With Serious Mental Illness Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2009; 60(5): 624 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Moye and D. C. Marson Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research Focus, January 1, 2009; 7(1): 88 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Moye and D. C. Marson Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older Adults: An Emerging Area of Practice and Research J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2007; 62(1): P3 - P11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us