Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Skodol, A. E. Articles by Gunderson, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Skodol, A. E. Articles by Gunderson, J. G. Depression Borderline Personality Disorders Other Personality Disorders Symptoms/Dimensions

Dimensional Representations of DSM-IV Personality Disorders: Relationships to Functional Impairment

OBJECTIVE: This study compared three-dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders and standard categories with respect to their associations with psychosocial functioning. METHOD: Six hundred sixty-eight patients with semistructured interview diagnoses of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorders or with major depressive disorder and no personality disorder completed questionnaires assessing three-factor and five-factor dimensional models of personality. Personality disorder categories, dimensional representations of the categories based on criteria counts, and three- and five-factor personality dimensions were compared on their relationships to impairment in seven domains of functioning, as measured by the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation—Baseline Version. RESULTS: Both the categorical and dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders had stronger relationships to impairment in functioning in the domains of employment, social relationships with parents and friends, and global social adjustment and to DSM-IV axis V ratings than the three- and five-factor models. DSM-IV dimensions predicted functional impairment best of the four approaches. Although five-factor personality traits captured variance in functional impairment not predicted by DSM-IV personality disorder dimensions, the DSM-IV dimensions accounted for significantly more variance than the measures of personality. CONCLUSIONS: Scores on dimensions of general personality functioning do not appear to be as strongly associated with functional impairment as the psychopathology of DSM personality disorder. A compromise in the ongoing debate over categories versus dimensions of personality disorder might be the dimensional rating of the criteria that comprise traditional categories.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Kendler, S. H. Aggen, N. Czajkowski, E. Roysamb, K. Tambs, S. Torgersen, M. C. Neale, and T. Reichborn-Kjennerud The Structure of Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for DSM-IV Personality Disorders: A Multivariate Twin Study Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 2008; 65(12): 1438 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Orstavik, K. S. Kendler, N. Czajkowski, K. Tambs, and T. Reichborn-Kjennerud The Relationship Between Depressive Personality Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: A Population-Based Twin Study Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 164(12): 1866 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Tyrer, N. Coombs, F. Ibrahimi, A. Mathilakath, P. Bajaj, M. Ranger, B. Rao, and R. Din Critical developments in the assessment of personality disorder The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s51 - s59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us