The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Mintz, D. C.
* Articles by Brickman, A. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Mintz, D. C.
* Articles by Brickman, A. L.
Related Collections
* Other Economics Issues
Am J Psychiatry 161:1103-1109, June 2004
© 2004 American Psychiatric Association


Article

Association of Utilization Management and Treatment Plan Modifications Among Practicing U.S. Psychiatrists

Devra C. Mintz, M.D., M.P.H., Steven C. Marcus, Ph.D., Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., Joyce C. West, Ph.D., and Andrew L. Brickman, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between utilization management techniques and psychiatrists’ treatment plan modifications. METHOD: Nationally representative data on 1,843 patients treated by 615 psychiatrists participating in the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education’s Practice Research Network were used to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients whose care was subjected to utilization management and to assess the association between utilization management and psychiatrists’ treatment plan modifications. RESULTS: Approximately half of all patients had treatment that was subject to utilization management (52.6%). For the patients whose treatment was not subject to utilization management, 15.5% had their treatment plan changed compared to the 31.5% who were subject to utilization management. Overall, after adjustment for differences in patients, settings, and psychiatrist characteristics, the patients subject to utilization management were 2.6 times more likely to have their treatment changed than the patients who were not subject to utilization management. These patients were 3.7 times more likely to have their type of treatment changed and 2.3 times more likely to have their frequency or number of visits changed. Psychiatrists in individual practice settings and those with nonsalaried income sources were more likely to modify treatment decisions for their patients when subject to utilization management. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of utilization management is highly associated with changes in psychiatrists’ treatment decisions. When compared to evidence-based treatment recommendations, these changes seem likely to result in less than optimal care.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. NewsHome page
M. Moran
Utilization Review Drives Treatment Plan Alterations
Psychiatr News, July 2, 2004; 39(13): 10 - 46.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2004 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org