The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Karp, J. F.
* Articles by Frank, E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Karp, J. F.
* Articles by Frank, E.
Related Collections
* Depression
* Symptoms/Dimensions
* Antidepressants
Am J Psychiatry 161:1877-1884, October 2004
© 2004 American Psychiatric Association

Relationship of Variability in Residual Symptoms With Recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder During Maintenance Treatment

Jordan F. Karp, M.D., Daniel J. Buysse, M.D., Patricia R. Houck, M.S.H., Christine Cherry, M.S., David J. Kupfer, M.D., and Ellen Frank, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how residual symptoms from an index episode of major depressive disorder may be associated with recurrence, the authors conducted a trial involving four maintenance treatment approaches and examined 1) whether the level and variability of residual symptoms differed among the maintenance treatment conditions and 2) whether greater symptom variability is associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence and more rapid recurrence. METHOD: Patients enrolled in a maintenance treatment study (N=114) were randomly assigned to one of four maintenance treatment conditions: imipramine plus interpersonal psychotherapy, imipramine alone, interpersonal psychotherapy alone, or no active treatment. Residual symptoms were characterized both as continuous variables (mean values and coefficients of variation for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Global Assessment Scale [GAS] scores) and as a categorical variable, the percentage of maintenance evaluations with a Hamilton depression scale score ≥8 (e.g., with a symptom peak). RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed no differences among the four treatment conditions in patients’ levels of residual symptoms or symptom variability assessed as a continuous variable, but patients in the combined treatment group had fewer symptom peaks, compared to those in the placebo and interpersonal psychotherapy groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that higher coefficients of variation for both the Hamilton depression scale and the GAS scores and a greater percentage of evaluations with symptom peaks were associated with shorter survival times. CONCLUSIONS: A higher level of symptom variability during maintenance treatment is associated with higher risk for recurrence of depression and may provide a specific target for maintenance treatments.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FocusHome page
J. F. Karp, D. J. Buysse, P. R. Houck, C. Cherry, D. J. Kupfer, and E. Frank
Relationship of Variability in Residual Symptoms With Recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder During Maintenance Treatment
Focus, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 161 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2004 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org