The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kim, S. Y.H.
* Articles by Holloway, R. G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Kim, S. Y.H.
* Articles by Holloway, R. G.
Related Collections
* Informed Consent
* Outpatient Services
* Depression
* Antidepressants
Am J Psychiatry 160:1272-1276, July 2003
© 2003 American Psychiatric Association


Article

Burdens and Benefits of Placebos in Antidepressant Clinical Trials: A Decision and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Scott Y.H. Kim, M.D., Ph.D., and Robert G. Holloway, M.D., M.P.H.

OBJECTIVE: The use of placebos is a necessary, if controversial, part of determining the efficacy of new antidepressants in randomized clinical trials. Such studies need to convey accurate and useful risk-benefit information to subjects since effective treatments are withheld. The authors assessed the cost-effectiveness of entering such a trial from the perspective of potential subjects. METHOD: The choice between individualized psychiatric treatment and an 8-week placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was modeled by using a static model. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of a potential subject who has moderate depression, is at low risk for suicide, has no comorbid conditions, and lacks adequate insurance to pay for mental health services. The trial was assumed to be free for subjects, except for indirect costs. Model outcomes included the probability of treatment response at 8 weeks and "decremental" cost-effectiveness. Data were based on reviews of published and some unpublished clinical trials of novel antidepressants that were eventually shown to be efficacious. RESULTS: A participant in a typical antidepressant efficacy trial has a chance of treatment response almost 25% less than that with individualized treatment. An uninsured participant can expect to save just over $164 for every 10% chance of response sacrificed by entering the placebo-controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: For placebo-controlled antidepressant trials, it is possible to derive systematic and evidence-based estimates of the burdens and potential benefits to subjects. Such information may be more useful for institutional review boards and potential subjects than an unstructured enumeration of risks and benefits.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
S. W. Woods, R. V. Gueorguieva, C. B. Baker, and R. W. Makuch
Control Group Bias in Randomized Atypical Antipsychotic Medication Trials for Schizophrenia
Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 62(9): 961 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. E. Solyom
Efficacy of Sertraline in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder
JAMA, January 7, 2004; 291(1): 41 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2003 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org