Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Kim, S. Y.H. Articles by Caine, E. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, S. Y.H. Articles by Caine, E. D. Miscellaneous Ethics Alzheimer's Disease Cognition

Impaired Decision-Making Ability in Subjects With Alzheimer’s Disease and Willingness to Participate in Research

OBJECTIVE: Ethical concerns persist over research participation of decisionally impaired persons, such as those suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. Such persons may be poor judges of the burdens and risks of specific research protocols. Since even decisionally incapacitated persons cannot be enrolled in studies against their objection, their preferences convey important ethical information. The authors examined the effects of cognitive and decisional impairment on willingness to participate in research among persons with Alzheimer’s disease. METHOD: Cognitive status, decision-making ability, and willingness to participate in four hypothetical research protocols of varying risk/benefit profiles were measured in 34 subjects with mild to mild/moderate Alzheimer’s disease and 14 healthy elderly comparison subjects. Univariate and multivariate methods were used to analyze the effects of impairment in cognitive and decision-making abilities on willingness to participate in research. RESULTS: There were no differences in willingness to participate found between the Alzheimer’s and the healthy comparison subjects for three of the four hypothetical protocols. In both groups, willingness declined as risk increased. Within the Alzheimer’s disease group, the presence of greater decisional impairment tended to predict less willingness to participate in research, even after adjusting for cognitive impairment, gender, and education. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with decisional impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease are as a group able to distinguish between research protocols of varying risk/benefit profiles. Because declining decision-making abilities may predict declining willingness to participate in research, informed consent procedures for Alzheimer’s disease research should be sensitive to this possibility.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.Y.H. Kim, H. M. Kim, K. M. Langa, J. H.T. Karlawish, D. S. Knopman, and P. S. Appelbaum Surrogate consent for dementia research: A national survey of older Americans Neurology, January 13, 2009; 72(2): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. V. Jeste, B. W. Palmer, P. S. Appelbaum, S. Golshan, D. Glorioso, L. B. Dunn, K. Kim, T. Meeks, and H. C. Kraemer A New Brief Instrument for Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research Arch Gen Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 64(8): 966 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Fisher, C. D. Cea, P. W. Davidson, and A. L. Fried Capacity of Persons With Mental Retardation to Consent to Participate in Randomized Clinical Trials Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2006; 163(10): 1813 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y.H. Kim and K. Kieburtz Appointing a proxy for research consent after one develops dementia: The need for further study Neurology, May 9, 2006; 66(9): 1298 - 1299. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Stocking, G. W. Hougham, D. D. Danner, M. B. Patterson, P. J. Whitehouse, and G. A. Sachs Speaking of research advance directives: Planning for future research participation Neurology, May 9, 2006; 66(9): 1361 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y.H. Kim, H. M. Kim, C. McCallum, and P. N. Tariot What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? Neurology, November 8, 2005; 65(9): 1395 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Wendler Can We Ensure That All Research Subjects Give Valid Consent? Arch Intern Med, November 8, 2004; 164(20): 2201 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Lapid, T. A. Rummans, V. S. Pankratz, and P. S. Appelbaum Decisional Capacity of Depressed Elderly to Consent to Electroconvulsive Therapy J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, March 1, 2004; 17(1): 42 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Maschke Proxy Research Consent and the Decisionally Impaired: Science, the Common Good, and Bodily Integrity Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2003; 13(4): 254 - 260. [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us