Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Williamson, D. A. Articles by Gleaves, D. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Williamson, D. A. Articles by Gleaves, D. H. Eating Disorders Diagnostic Criteria Symptoms/Dimensions

Latent Structure of Eating Disorder Symptoms: A Factor Analytic and Taxometric Investigation

OBJECTIVE: The latent structure of eating disorder symptoms, as defined by DSM-IV, was tested in a group of 341 women with and without an eating disorder diagnosis. METHOD: The study group consisted of 201 participants with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, or eating disorder not otherwise specified; 24 comparison subjects who were obese but did not have an eating disorder diagnosis; and 116 normal-weight comparison subjects. The presence and severity of DSM-IV eating disorder symptoms was assessed with the semi-structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Eating Disorders—IV. The study group was randomly divided into two subgroups for factor analytic studies, and the data were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Pilot taxometric analyses were used to examine whether the obtained factors represented true dimensions or latent discrete classes. RESULTS: In exploratory factor analyses with data from subgroup 1, three factors were found to account for 66% of the variance in eating disorder symptoms: binge eating, fear of fatness/compensatory behaviors, and drive for extreme thinness. Confirmatory factor analysis cross-validated this factor structure with data from subgroup 2. The eating disorder groups and comparison groups were found to differ on at least one of the three factors. The results of the taxometric analyses were inconsistent with a strictly dimensional model of eating disorders and suggested that some features may be dimensional whereas others may be taxonic (discrete). Discussion: The eating disorders, as defined by DSM-IV, can be conceptualized as having three latent features. Taxometric tests found empirical support for conceptualizing bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder as discrete syndromes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.C.T. Slof-Op 't Landt, E.F. van Furth, I. Rebollo-Mesa, M. Bartels, C.E.M. van Beijsterveldt, P.E. Slagboom, D.I. Boomsma, I. Meulenbelt, and C.V. Dolan Sex Differences in Sum Scores May Be Hard to Interpret: The Importance of Measurement Invariance Assessment, December 1, 2009; 16(4): 415 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Walters and K. McCoy Taxometric Analysis of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles in Incarcerated Offenders and College Students Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2007; 34(6): 781 - 793. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Mataix-Cols, M. C. do Rosario-Campos, and J. F. Leckman A Multidimensional Model of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 162(2): 228 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Gleaves, J. D. Brown, and C. S. Warren The Continuity/Discontinuity Models of Eating Disorders: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention Behav Modif, November 1, 2004; 28(6): 739 - 762. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. K. Keel, M. Fichter, N. Quadflieg, C. M. Bulik, M. G. Baxter, L. Thornton, K. A. Halmi, A. S. Kaplan, M. Strober, D. B. Woodside, et al. Application of a Latent Class Analysis to Empirically Define Eating Disorder Phenotypes Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 61(2): 192 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us