The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Binder, R. L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Binder, R. L.
Related Collections
* Other Forensic Issues
Am J Psychiatry 159:1819-1825, November 2002
© 2002 American Psychiatric Association


Reviews and Overviews

Liability for the Psychiatrist Expert Witness

Renée L. Binder, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of general psychiatrists are acting as expert witnesses in the legal system. The purpose of this article is to help psychiatrists who are interested in doing forensic work by informing them of the risks entailed. METHOD: The author reviews the medical and legal literature about expert witness immunity. RESULTS: The author explains the traditional concept of expert witness immunity and shows how a variety of factors have led to the erosion of this immunity. These factors include the proliferation of experts, the inadequacy of traditional safeguards of potential prosecution for perjury and cross-examination, the growth of attorney malpractice, the lack of protection of the injured party from unscrupulous witnesses, and the ineffectiveness of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. Examples are given of how expert witnesses are being held accountable by professional associations and state medical boards and through tort liability. CONCLUSIONS: The author provides risk-management strategies and guidelines for psychiatrists who are considering engaging in forensic work.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
L. H. Gold, S. A. Anfang, A. M. Drukteinis, J. L. Metzner, M. Price, B. W. Wall, L. Wylonis, and H. V. Zonana
AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2008; 36(4 Suppl): S3 - S50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Mossman, S. G. Noffsinger, P. Ash, R. L. Frierson, J. Gerbasi, M. Hackett, C. F. Lewis, D. A. Pinals, C. L. Scott, K. G. Sieg, et al.
AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2007; 35(Supplement_4): S3 - S72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
L. H. Gold and J. E. Davidson
Do You Understand Your Risk? Liability and Third-Party Evaluations in Civil Litigation
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2007; 35(2): 200 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
T. G. GUTHEIL
Psychiatrists as Expert Witnesses
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2004; 161(11): 2141 - 2141.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org