Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Appelbaum, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Appelbaum, P. S. Confidentiality Informed Consent Health Policy and Legislation

Privacy in Psychiatric Treatment: Threats and Responses

OBJECTIVE: The author provides an overview of the current status of privacy in psychiatric treatment, with particular attention to the effects of new federal regulations authorized by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). METHOD: The author reviews the ethical and legal underpinnings for medical privacy, including the empirical data supporting its importance; discusses those portions of the new federal regulations most relevant to psychiatric practice; and suggests steps that psychiatrists can take to maintain their patients’ privacy in the new environment. RESULTS: Medical ethics and law, in keeping with patients’ preferences, traditionally have provided strong protection for the information that patients communicate while receiving medical care. In general, release of information has required patients’ explicit consent. However, limitations of the consent model and technological innovations that permit the aggregation of computerized medical information have led to pressure for greater access to these data. Although the new federal regulations offer patients some additional protections (including security for psychotherapy notes), they also mark a retreat from reliance on patient consent and open up records to previously unauthorized uses, among them law enforcement investigations and marketing and fundraising by health care organizations. However, states retain the power to provide higher levels of protection. CONCLUSIONS: The new regulatory environment is less friendly to medical privacy but still leaves a great deal of discretion in physicians’ hands. A commitment to protecting privacy as an ethical norm can be advanced by psychiatrists’ requesting patients’ consent even when it is not required, by ensuring that patients are aware of the limits on confidentiality, and by avoiding unnecessary breaches of privacy in the course of providing psychiatric care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tripathi, D. Delano, B. Lund, and L. Rudolph Engaging Patients For Health Information Exchange Health Aff., March 1, 2009; 28(2): 435 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. T. Mermelstein and J. J. Wallack Confidentiality in the Age of HIPAA: A Challenge for Psychosomatic Medicine Psychosomatics, April 1, 2008; 49(2): 97 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. LEEMAN Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn of Possible Harm Am J Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 161(3): 583 - 583. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. C. GLEASON and W. R. YATES Suicide Attempt Due to a Misunderstood HIPAA Notice Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2004; 161(2): 374 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Appelbaum Privacy in Psychiatric Treatment: Threats and Responses Focus, October 1, 2003; 1(4): 396 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2002 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us