The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Green, S. A.
* Articles by Bloch, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Green, S. A.
* Articles by Bloch, S.
Related Collections
* Miscellaneous Ethics
Am J Psychiatry 158:1378-1383, September 2001
© 2001 American Psychiatric Association


Reviews and Overviews

Working in a Flawed Mental Health Care System: An Ethical Challenge

Stephen A. Green, M.D., M.A., and Sidney Bloch, M.D., Ph.D.

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatrists are under immense ethical pressure when practicing in circumstances that reasonable, informed colleagues would regard as not "good enough" in that they do not adequately meet the needs of patients and patients’ families. This article is an examination of the ethical quandaries that ensue and options for response. METHOD: The authors explore the ways in which mental health systems may become flawed and compare philosophical arguments that deal with the predicament of working in such systems. RESULTS: The principle of fidelity to the patient is compromised in flawed systems, thus threatening professional integrity. Arguments for efficiency or the greater good in the provision of mental health care fail as remedies since they both lead to harms for particular clinical groups, as well as downgrading of a psychiatrist’s integrity. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrists should submit to the principle of fidelity in working with patients. Since flawed systems undermine fidelity, threatening the patient’s interests, psychiatrists are morally responsible for working to improve such systems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
C. A. Vassilas and S. Matthews
Pharmaceutical sponsorship of educational events: what can we learn from healthcare ethics?
Psychiatr. Bull., May 1, 2006; 30(5): 189 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
K. G. Provan, K. R. Isett, and H. B. Milward
Cooperation and Compromise: A Network Response to Conflicting Institutional Pressures in Community Mental Health
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2004; 33(3): 489 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J. G. Stovall, M. Hobart, and J. L. Geller
The Impact of an Employees' Strike on a Community Mental Health Center
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2004; 55(2): 188 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. MENDER
Moral Dilemmas Faced by Psychiatrists
Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2002; 159(8): 1443 - 1443.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2001 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org