The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Malmquist, C. P.
* Articles by Notman, M. T.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Malmquist, C. P.
* Articles by Notman, M. T.
Related Collections
* Miscellaneous Ethics
Am J Psychiatry 158:1010-1018, July 2001
© 2001 American Psychiatric Association


Reviews and Overviews

Psychiatrist-Patient Boundary Issues Following Treatment Termination

Carl P. Malmquist, M.D., and Malkah T. Notman, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatrist-patient relationships after termination of treatment are fraught with complexities and are the subject of ongoing debate. The authors discuss the issue of boundary violation allegations that arise after treatment has ended, with the goal of explicating how these issues have been handled in psychiatric discussions as well as in broader sociolegal settings. METHOD: Clinical illustrations and legal cases are used to illustrate how legal and administrative bodies have dealt with posttermination boundary issues. RESULTS: Courts and regulatory bodies have tended to use the psychoanalytic concept of transference to decide issues in which there has been a complaint of impropriety—be it romantic, financial, or social in nature—arising after termination of treatment. However, a multitude of treatment approaches are currently employed in psychiatry, and often their practitioners either do not use the concept of transference or deny its validity. If the concept is used, it is often present in many settings outside therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of transference is subject to continuing debate and modification within psychoanalysis, and its use in judicial or quasijudicial settings raises questions about whether it meets standards of scientific acceptance. Using the concept of transference to decide posttermination issues results not only in confusion but also has the potential for many adverse consequences for practitioners and the profession.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acad. PsychiatryHome page
G. E. Myers
Addressing the Effects of Culture on the Boundary-Keeping Practices of Psychiatry Residents Educated Outside of the United States
Acad Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 28(1): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. S. EPSTEIN
Posttermination Boundary Issues
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2002; 159(5): 877 - 878.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2001 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org