The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Beahrs, J. O.
* Articles by Gutheil, T. G.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Beahrs, J. O.
* Articles by Gutheil, T. G.
Am J Psychiatry 158:4-10, January 2001
© 2001 American Psychiatric Association


Reviews and Overviews

Informed Consent in Psychotherapy

John O. Beahrs, M.D., and Thomas G. Gutheil, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought a rational approach to implementing informed consent within the practice of psychotherapy. METHOD: The history of informed consent in psychotherapy was reviewed to define a common synthesis that maximizes the potential benefits and minimizes the potential hazards. RESULTS: The benefits of informed consent in psychotherapy include fostering a positive treatment outcome through enhancing patient autonomy, responsibility, and self-therapeutic activity; lessening the risks of regressive effects and therapist liability; and helping the practice of psychotherapy extend beyond particular parochialisms by providing checks and balances on therapist judgments. The hazards include the unpredictability of interactional outcomes and the possibilities of replacing positive expectancy with negative suggestion, replacing a therapeutic alliance with a legalistic stance, and misimplying that patients are passive recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Practical implementation of informed consent in psychotherapy must balance such tensions in service of optimal treatment. As a guiding principle, the authors recommend that psychotherapists convey to a prospective patient information that is material to the particular patient’s decision. The level of detail needed in informed consent discussions varies directly with the cost and risks of the proposed treatment, the presence of viable alternatives and their relative grounding in scientific data and professional acceptance, and the presence of significant controversy. Unresolved is the question of how to address problematic or controversial psychotherapeutic trends that temporarily enjoy wide professional support.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
B. R. Rutherford and S. P. Roose
Do Psychiatry Residents Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotherapy?
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2006; 54(4): 1343 - 1347.
[PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
R. I. Simon
The Law and Psychiatry
Focus, October 1, 2003; 1(4): 349 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. P. ROSENBAUM
Psychotherapy by Nonphysicians
Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2001; 158(12): 2091 - 2092.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2001 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org