Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Krystal, A. D. Articles by Massie, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Krystal, A. D. Articles by Massie, R. W. ECT

ECT Stimulus Intensity: Are Present ECT Devices Too Limited?

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The maximum output charge for ECT devices is limited to 576 millicoulombs in the United States, although there are no data ensuring that this limit will allow consistently effective treatments. The authors examined whether this limit has a negative impact on therapeutic response and, therefore, whether a higher stimulus charge should be available.METHOD: They retrospectively reviewed the records of 471 patients who received a clinical index course of ECT at Duke University between 1991 and 1998. These patients received conservative stimulus dosing of 2.25 times seizure threshold for unilateral ECT and 1.5 times seizure threshold for bilateral ECT.RESULTS: Seventy-two (15%) of the 471 patients required the maximum stimulus intensity during their index ECT course. Of these, 24 (5% of the total) had either a short EEG seizure (less than 25 seconds) or had no seizure at the maximum level. Strategies to augment therapeutic response with caffeine, ketamine, or hyperventilation were used in 14 of the 24 patients, and data on therapeutic response were available for 22 of the 24. Only seven (32%) of these 22 patients were considered ECT responders, compared with 242 (66%) of the remaining 364 patients for whom data on response to ECT were available. Older age and pre-ECT course EEG slowing were predictors of requiring the maximum stimulus level.CONCLUSIONS: The maximum available stimulus output was therapeutically insufficient for 5% of the patients studied even when available means to augment response were instituted. This percentage would likely be even larger with the use of a less conservative dosing protocol for unilateral ECT. Increases in maximum stimulus output for ECT devices should be considered as a means to ensure adequate treatment response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Greenberg and C. H. Kellner Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Selected Review Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, April 1, 2005; 13(4): 268 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sanacora, G. F. Mason, D. L. Rothman, F. Hyder, J. J. Ciarcia, R. B. Ostroff, R. M. Berman, and J. H. Krystal Increased Cortical GABA Concentrations in Depressed Patients Receiving ECT Am J Psychiatry, March 1, 2003; 160(3): 577 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Krystal, R. D. Weiner, M. D. Dean, V. H. Lindahl, L. A. Tramontozzi III, G. Falcone, and C. E. Coffey Comparison of Seizure Duration, Ictal EEG, and Cognitive Effects of Ketamine and Methohexital Anesthesia With ECT J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, February 1, 2003; 15(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. MacEwan An audit of seizure duration in electroconvulsive therapy Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2002; 26(9): 337 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. SWARTZ ECT Failure Rate Among Specific Devices Am J Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 158(6): 973 - 974. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2000 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us