Am J Psychiatry 157:772-780, May 2000
© 2000 American Psychiatric Association
Continuous Performance Test and Schizophrenia: A Test of Stimulus-Response Compatibility, Working Memory, Response Readiness, or None of the Above?
Brita Elvevåg, Ph.D.,
Daniel R. Weinberger, M.D.,
Jesse C. Suter, B.A., and
Terry E. Goldberg, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Abnormalities of attention are considered the fundamental deficits in cognitive function manifested by patients with schizophrenia. The authors administered variations of two types of cognitive tasks to patients with schizophrenia (N=20) and normal comparison subjects (N=30) to test four possible cognitive mechanisms that might account for such abnormalities. METHOD: Variations of the Continuous Performance Test were used to test the four mechanisms. Stimulus-response mapping was explored by comparing results on a task in which subjects were to make a response if the word "nine" was preceded by the word "one" with results on a task in which the required response was made explicit by the stimulus (the word "ready" followed by the word "press"). The building up of a prepotent response tendency was tested by manipulating the probability with which the cue and imperative stimulus appeared (17% or 50%). The amount of working memory required to maintain contextual information was tested by using different delay intervals (1000 msec and 3000 msec). The extent to which problems in vigilance might be attributable to problems in the "motoric" component of response readiness was operationalized by having subjects perform a secondary motor task concurrent with the attentional task. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than the normal comparison subjects on all tasks. However, none of the four manipulations of the Continuous Performance Test tasks had a differential impact on the patients’ performance speed or accuracy. In contrast, there was a significant interaction of group, delay interval, and target probability in which patients made disproportionately more omission errors at short delay intervals and at low target probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may call into question the explanatory power of certain well-known contemporary mechanistic accounts of performance on the Continuous Performance Test in patients with schizophrenia. The findings suggest that a difficulty in rapidly encoding information (i.e., constructing a representation) in certain "unengaging" situations may be at the core of deficits on tasks associated with this attentional test.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. Silver and P. Feldman
Evidence for Sustained Attention and Working Memory in Schizophrenia Sharing a Common Mechanism
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci,
August 1, 2005;
17(3):
391 - 398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sarter, C. L Nelson, and J. P Bruno
Cortical Cholinergic Transmission and Cortical Information Processing in Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull,
January 1, 2005;
31(1):
117 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. Dias, J. J. Foxe, and D. C. Javitt
Changing Plans: a High Density Electrical Mapping Study of Cortical Control
Cereb Cortex,
July 1, 2003;
13(7):
701 - 715.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. F. Rabinowicz, G. Silipo, R. Goldman, and D. C. Javitt
Auditory Sensory Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: Imprecision or Distractibility?
Arch Gen Psychiatry,
December 1, 2000;
57(12):
1149 - 1155.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2000
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|
