Am J Psychiatry 157:588-594, April 2000
© 2000 American Psychiatric Association
Use of Exclusion Criteria in Selecting Research Subjects and Its Effect on the Generalizability of Alcohol Treatment Outcome Studies
Keith Humphreys, Ph.D., and
Constance Weisner, Dr.P.H.
OBJECTIVE: Researchers have not systematically examined how exclusion criteria used in selection of research subjects affect the generalizability of treatment outcome research. This study evaluated the use of exclusion criteria in alcohol treatment outcome research and its effects on the comparability of research subjects with real-world individuals seeking alcohol treatment. METHOD: Eight of the most common exclusion criteria described in the alcohol treatment research literature were operationalized and applied to large, representative clinical patient samples from the public and private sectors to determine whether the hypothetical research samples differed substantially from real-world samples. Five hundred ninety-three consecutive individuals seeking alcohol treatment at one of eight treatment programs participated. A trained research technician gathered information from participants on demographic variables and on alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems as measured by the Addiction Severity Index. RESULTS: Large proportions of potential research subjects were excluded under most of the criteria tested. The overall pattern of results showed that African Americans, low-income individuals, and individuals who had more severe alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems were disproportionately excluded under most criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusion criteria can result in alcohol treatment outcome research samples that are more heavily composed of white, economically stable, and higher-functioning individuals than are real-world samples of substance abuse patients seen in clinical practice, potentially compromising the generalizability of results. For both scientific and ethical reasons, in addition to studies that use exclusion criteria, outcome research that uses no or minimal exclusion criteria should be conducted so that alcohol treatment outcome research can be better generalized to vulnerable populations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C. Buri, F. Moggi, A. Giovanoli, and W. Strik
Prescription procedures in medication for relapse prevention after inpatient treatment for alcohol use disorders in Switzerland
Alcohol Alcohol.,
July 1, 2007;
42(4):
333 - 339.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. R. Cohen and D. A. Hien
Treatment Outcomes for Women With Substance Abuse and PTSD Who Have Experienced Complex Trauma
Psychiatr Serv,
January 1, 2006;
57(1):
100 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Hien, L. R. Cohen, G. M. Miele, L. C. Litt, and C. Capstick
Promising Treatments for Women With Comorbid PTSD and Substance Use Disorders
Am J Psychiatry,
August 1, 2004;
161(8):
1426 - 1432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Walker, T. Logan, C. E. Jordan, and J. C. Campbell
An Integrative Review of Separation in the Context of Victimization: Consequences and Implications for Women
Trauma Violence Abuse,
April 1, 2004;
5(2):
143 - 193.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Carroll and B. J. Rounsaville
Bridging the Gap: A Hybrid Model to Link Efficacy and Effectiveness Research in Substance Abuse Treatment
Psychiatr Serv,
March 1, 2003;
54(3):
333 - 339.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2000
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|
