Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Gardner, W. Articles by Roth, L. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Gardner, W. Articles by Roth, L. H.

Patients' Revisions of Their Beliefs About the Need for Hospitalization

OBJECTIVE: An influential rationale for involuntary hospitalization is that prospective patients who refuse hospitalization at the time it is offered are likely to change their belief about the necessity of hospitalization after receiving hospital treatment. The authors examine how patients changed their evaluations of psychiatric hospitalization following hospital treatment. METHOD: The authors studied 433 patients who were interviewed about their hospitalization within 2 days of their admission to a psychiatric hospital; 267 of these patients were reinterviewed 4–8 weeks following discharge. RESULTS: When reinterviewed at follow-up, 33 (52%) of 64 patients who said at admission that they did not need hospitalization said that, in retrospect, they believed they had needed it. Only 9 (5%) of 198 patients who said at admission that they needed hospitalization shifted to saying that they had not needed it. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the patients who initially judged that they did not need hospitalization revised their belief after hospital discharge and reported that they had needed hospital treatment. However, perceptions of coercion were stable from admission to follow-up, and patients' attitudes toward hospitalization did not become more positive. Coerced patients did not appear to be grateful for the experience of hospitalization, even if they later concluded that they had needed it.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bergk, B. Einsiedler, and T. Steinert Feasibility of randomized controlled trials on seclusion and mechanical restraint Clinical Trials, August 1, 2008; 5(4): 356 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Guarda, A. M. Pinto, J. W. Coughlin, S. Hussain, N. A. Haug, and L. J. Heinberg Perceived Coercion and Change in Perceived Need for Admission in Patients Hospitalized for Eating Disorders Am J Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 164(1): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Frueh, R. G. Knapp, K. J. Cusack, A. L. Grubaugh, J. A. Sauvageot, V. C. Cousins, E. Yim, C. S. Robins, J. Monnier, and T. G. Hiers Special Section on Seclusion and Restraint: Patients' Reports of Traumatic or Harmful Experiences Within the Psychiatric Setting Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 2005; 56(9): 1123 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Steinert and P. Schmid Effect of Voluntariness of Participation in Treatment on Short-Term Outcome of Inpatients With Schizophrenia Psychiatr Serv, July 1, 2004; 55(7): 786 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Singh Commentary Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2001; 7(4): 291 - 293. [Full Text]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us