The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Welkowitz, L. A.
* Articles by Gorman, J. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Welkowitz, L. A.
* Articles by Gorman, J. M.
Related Collections
* Panic Disorder
* Other Research Techniques
Am J Psychiatry 156:745-748, May 1999
© 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Regular Article

Instructional Set and Physiological Response to CO2 Inhalation

Lawrence A. Welkowitz, Ph.D., Laszlo Papp, M.D., Jose Martinez, M.S., Susan Browne, B.A., and Jack M. Gorman, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that manipulations in patient instructions before inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2) may blunt its anxiogenic effects. The authors examined the effects of a range of instructional types on panic rates and physiological responses to CO2 inhalation. METHOD: Thirty-seven patients with panic disorder and 16 normal subjects were exposed to CO2 inhalation under one of three instructional conditions: 1) reassurance (reiterated safety assurances), 2) control dial (patients were instructed on using an operative dial to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the breathing canopy), and 3) basic instructions (standard information). Perceived breathlessness was measured with the Borg Scale of Respiratory Exertion. RESULTS: Manipulation of instructional sets did not affect panic rates among patients. The reassurance condition, however, produced a significant reduction in perceived breathlessness. CONCLUSIONS: CO2-induced panic is a robust biological effect that occurs independent of cognitive set changes, such as illusion of control or reassurance of safety. Conclusions drawn from this study are bolstered by the fact that it is methodologically rigorous: it had a large number of subjects, used random assignment to one of three instructions, included a full array of both subjective and biological measures, and included independent ratings.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
C. Campbell and T. Fahy
The role of the doctor when a patient commits suicide
Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2002; 26(2): 44 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
J. M. Gorman, J. Kent, J. Martinez, S. Browne, J. Coplan, and L. A. Papp
Physiological Changes During Carbon Dioxide Inhalation in Patients With Panic Disorder, Major Depression, and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: Evidence for a Central Fear Mechanism
Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 2001; 58(2): 125 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. M. Kent, L. A. Papp, J. M. Martinez, S. T. Browne, J. D. Coplan, D. F. Klein, and J. M. Gorman
Specificity of Panic Response to CO2 Inhalation in Panic Disorder: A Comparison With Major Depression and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
Am J Psychiatry, January 1, 2001; 158(1): 58 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org