The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Pope, H. G.
* Articles by Gruber, A. J.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Pope, H. G., Jr.
* Articles by Gruber, A. J.
Related Collections
* Dissociative Disorders
* DSM
Am J Psychiatry 156:321-323, February 1999
©Copyright 1999 American Psychiatric Association


Brief Report

Attitudes Toward DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders Diagnoses Among Board-Certified American Psychiatrists

Harrison G. Pope, Jr., M.D., Paul S. Oliva, Ed.M., James I. Hudson, M.D., S.M., J. Alexander Bodkin, M.D., and Amanda J. Gruber, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the opinions of American psychiatrists regarding the diagnostic status and scientific validity of the DSM-IV categories of dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder. METHOD: A one-page questionnaire was mailed to a random national sample of 367 board-certified American psychiatrists. RESULTS: Three hundred one responses were received—a rate of 82%. Only about one-third of respondents replied that dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder should be included without reservations in DSM-IV; a larger proportion replied that these categories should be included only as proposed diagnoses. Only about one-quarter of respondents felt that diagnoses of dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder were supported by strong evidence of scientific validity. CONCLUSIONS: Among board-certified American psychiatrists, there currently appears to be little consensus regarding the diagnostic status or scientific validity of dissociative amnesia and dissociative identity disorder.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. L. Manning and R. L. Manning
Legion Theory: A Meta-psychology
Theory Psychology, December 1, 2007; 17(6): 839 - 862.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Trauma Violence AbuseHome page
C. Dalenberg
Recovered memory and the daubert criteria: recovered memory as professionally tested, peer reviewed, and accepted in the relevant scientific community.
Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2006; 7(4): 274 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
Z. Xiao, H. Yan, Z. Wang, Z. Zou, Y. Xu, M.D., J. Chen, M.D., H. Zhang, M.D., C. A. Ross, and B. B. Keyes
Trauma and Dissociation in China
Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 163(8): 1388 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
A. S. FRANKEL and S. A. SPAN
Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Dissociative Disorders Diagnoses
Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 157(7): 1179 - 1179.
[Full Text]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1999 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org